Literature DB >> 24395474

Greenhouse gas budget (CO2, CH4 and N2O) of intensively managed grassland following restoration.

Lutz Merbold1, Werner Eugster, Jacqueline Stieger, Mark Zahniser, David Nelson, Nina Buchmann.   

Abstract

The first full greenhouse gas (GHG) flux budget of an intensively managed grassland in Switzerland (Chamau) is presented. The three major trace gases, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) were measured with the eddy covariance (EC) technique. For CO2 concentrations, an open-path infrared gas analyzer was used, while N2O and CH4 concentrations were measured with a recently developed continuous-wave quantum cascade laser absorption spectrometer (QCLAS). We investigated the magnitude of these trace gas emissions after grassland restoration, including ploughing, harrowing, sowing, and fertilization with inorganic and organic fertilizers in 2012. Large peaks of N2O fluxes (20-50 nmol m(-2) s(-1) compared with a <5 nmol m(-2) s(-1) background) were observed during thawing of the soil after the winter period and after mineral fertilizer application followed by re-sowing in the beginning of the summer season. Nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes were controlled by nitrogen input, plant productivity, soil water content and temperature. Management activities led to increased variations of N2O fluxes up to 14 days after the management event as compared with background fluxes measured during periods without management (<5 nmol m(-2) s(-1)). Fluxes of CO2 remained small until full plant development in early summer 2012. In contrast, methane emissions showed only minor variations over time. The annual GHG flux budget was dominated by N2O (48% contribution) and CO2 emissions (44%). CH4 flux contribution to the annual budget was only minor (8%). We conclude that recently developed multi-species QCLAS in an EC system open new opportunities to determine the temporal variation of N2O and CH4 fluxes, which further allow to quantify annual emissions. With respect to grassland restoration, our study emphasizes the key role of N2O and CO2 losses after ploughing, changing a permanent grassland from a carbon sink to a significant carbon source.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  QCLAS; SwissFluxNet; carbon dioxide; carbon sink; eddy covariance; methane; nitrous oxide; ploughing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24395474     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  7 in total

1.  Microbial N Transformations and N2O Emission after Simulated Grassland Cultivation: Effects of the Nitrification Inhibitor 3,4-Dimethylpyrazole Phosphate (DMPP).

Authors:  Yun-Feng Duan; Xian-Wang Kong; Andreas Schramm; Rodrigo Labouriau; Jørgen Eriksen; Søren O Petersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Methane and nitrous oxide exchange over a managed hay meadow.

Authors:  L Hörtnagl; G Wohlfahrt
Journal:  Biogeosciences       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.295

Review 3.  Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use.

Authors:  Jeanette Whitaker; John L Field; Carl J Bernacchi; Carlos E P Cerri; Reinhart Ceulemans; Christian A Davies; Evan H DeLucia; Iain S Donnison; Jon P McCalmont; Keith Paustian; Rebecca L Rowe; Pete Smith; Patricia Thornley; Niall P McNamara
Journal:  Glob Change Biol Bioenergy       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.745

4.  Impact of understory vegetation on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamic in aerially seeded Pinus massoniana plantations.

Authors:  Ping Pan; Fang Zhao; Jinkui Ning; Ling Zhang; Xunzhi Ouyang; Hao Zang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Soil Moisture-Temperature Coupling in a Set of Land Surface Models.

Authors:  A I Gevaert; D G Miralles; R A M de Jeu; J Schellekens; A J Dolman
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.261

6.  Maximizing the information obtained from chamber-based greenhouse gas exchange measurements in remote areas.

Authors:  Haifa Debouk; Núria Altimir; Maria-Teresa Sebastià
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2018-08-22

7.  When Does Vapor Pressure Deficit Drive or Reduce Evapotranspiration?

Authors:  Adam Massmann; Pierre Gentine; Changjie Lin
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 6.660

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.