Literature DB >> 24395071

Development of an improved risk calculator for complications in proctectomy.

Scott K Sherman1, Jennifer E Hrabe, Mary E Charlton, John W Cromwell, John C Byrn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rectal surgery is associated with high complication rates, but tools to prospectively define surgical risk are lacking. Improved preoperative risk assessment could better inform patients and refine decision making by surgeons. Our objective was to develop a validated model for proctectomy risk prediction.
METHODS: We reviewed non-emergent ACS-NSQIP proctectomy data from 2005 to 2011 (n = 13,385). Logistic regression identified variables available prior to surgery showing independent association with 30-day morbidity in 2010-2011 (n = 5,570). The resulting risk model's discrimination and calibration were tested against the NSQIP-supplied morbidity model, and performance was validated against independent 2005-2009 data.
RESULTS: Overall morbidity for proctectomy in 2010-2011 was 40.2%; significantly higher than the 23.0 % rate predicted by the NSQIP-provided general and vascular surgery risk model. Frequent complications included bleeding (16.3%), superficial infection (9.2%), and sepsis (7.4%). Our novel model incorporating 17 preoperative variables provided better discrimination and calibration (p < 0.05) than the NSQIP model and was validated against the 2005-2009 data. A web-based calculator makes this new model available for prospective risk assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the NSQIP-supplied risk model underestimates proctectomy morbidity and that this new, validated risk model and risk prediction tool ( http://myweb.uiowa.edu/sksherman ) may allow clinicians to counsel patients with accurate risk estimates using data available in the preoperative setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24395071      PMCID: PMC4016157          DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2448-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  28 in total

1.  Use of Brier score to assess binary predictions.

Authors:  Kaspar Rufibach
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Standardizing the power of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets.

Authors:  Prabasaj Paul; Michael L Pennell; Stanley Lemeshow
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  2000

4.  Assessment of operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model.

Authors:  Victor W Fazio; Paris P Tekkis; Feza Remzi; Ian C Lavery
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Restorative proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in obese patients.

Authors:  Jorge A Canedo; Rodrigo A Pinto; Elisabeth C McLemore; Lester Rosen; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Effect of BMI on outcomes in proctectomy.

Authors:  Jennifer E Hrabe; Scott K Sherman; Mary E Charlton; John W Cromwell; John C Byrn
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Is the abdominal repair of rectal prolapse safer than perineal repair in the highest risk patients? An NSQIP analysis.

Authors:  Sandy H Fang; John W Cromwell; Kirsten B Wilkins; Theodore E Eisenstat; Joseph R Notaro; Suraj Alva; Rami Bustami; Bertram T Chinn
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Assessing the calibration of mortality benchmarks in critical care: The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revisited.

Authors:  Andrew A Kramer; Jack E Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Systematic bias in surgeons' predictions of the donor-specific risk of liver transplant graft failure.

Authors:  Michael L Volk; Meghan Roney; Robert M Merion
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 5.799

View more
  6 in total

1.  Estimating Surgical Risk for Patients With Severe Comorbidities.

Authors:  Scott K Sherman; Elizabeth C Poli; Muneera R Kapadia; Kiran K Turaga
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Prospective Validation of the Iowa Rectal Surgery Risk Calculator.

Authors:  Scott K Sherman; Jennifer E Hrabe; Emily Huang; John W Cromwell; John C Byrn
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Risk calculators predict failures of knee and hip arthroplasties: findings from a large health maintenance organization.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Paxton; Maria C S Inacio; Monti Khatod; Eric Yue; Tadashi Funahashi; Thomas Barber
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Differences in short-term outcomes among patients undergoing IPAA with or without preoperative radiation: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.

Authors:  Brittany E Wertzberger; Scott K Sherman; John C Byrn
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Assessment of the Addition of Hypoalbuminemia to ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Wan-Hsiang Hu; Hong-Hwa Chen; Ko-Chao Lee; Lin Liu; Samuel Eisenstein; Lisa Parry; Bard Cosman; Sonia Ramamoorthy
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Beyond 30 Days: A Risk Calculator for Longer Term Outcomes of Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jordan T Blough; Michael M Vu; Cecil S Qiu; Alexei S Mlodinow; Nima Khavanin; Neil A Fine; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-12-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.