Rene D Largo1, Laurent A H Tchang2, Valentina Mele3, Arnaud Scherberich3, Yves Harder4, Reto Wettstein2, Dirk J Schaefer2. 1. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland(a). Electronic address: rene.largo@usb.ch. 2. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland(a). 3. Institute for Surgical Research and Hospital Management, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 4. Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fat grafting for primary breast augmentation is growing in popularity due to its autologous properties and its side benefit of removing unwanted fat from other areas, although volume gain is unpredictable and patient safety remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide an evidence-based overview of autologous fat grafting to healthy breast tissue with focus on volume gain, safety and complications. DESIGN: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases were searched for clinical studies on autologous fat grafting to healthy breast tissue within the last 30 years. DATA EXTRACTION: Clinical articles were evaluated for indication, pre- and postoperative work-up, surgical technique, volume gain (efficacy), complications, radiographic changes and oncological safety. The level of evidence was assessed according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine 2011. RESULTS: A total of 36 articles involving 1453 patients with a mean follow-up period of 16.3 months (1-156 months) were included. No randomised controlled studies were found. Six percent of the patients undergoing fat grafting to healthy breast tissue experienced major complications requiring a surgical intervention or hospitalisation. Two patients with breast cancer (0.1%) after fat grafting for cosmetic purposes were reported. Average breast volume gain ranged from 55% to 82% relative to the grafted fat volume. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of complications and re-operations in fat grafting to healthy breast tissue compared favourably to implant-based breast augmentation. Although no increased incidence of breast cancer was found, long-term breast cancer screening and the implementation of publicly accessible registries are critically important to proving the safety of fat grafting.
BACKGROUND: Fat grafting for primary breast augmentation is growing in popularity due to its autologous properties and its side benefit of removing unwanted fat from other areas, although volume gain is unpredictable and patient safety remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide an evidence-based overview of autologous fat grafting to healthy breast tissue with focus on volume gain, safety and complications. DESIGN: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases were searched for clinical studies on autologous fat grafting to healthy breast tissue within the last 30 years. DATA EXTRACTION: Clinical articles were evaluated for indication, pre- and postoperative work-up, surgical technique, volume gain (efficacy), complications, radiographic changes and oncological safety. The level of evidence was assessed according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine 2011. RESULTS: A total of 36 articles involving 1453 patients with a mean follow-up period of 16.3 months (1-156 months) were included. No randomised controlled studies were found. Six percent of the patients undergoing fat grafting to healthy breast tissue experienced major complications requiring a surgical intervention or hospitalisation. Two patients with breast cancer (0.1%) after fat grafting for cosmetic purposes were reported. Average breast volume gain ranged from 55% to 82% relative to the grafted fat volume. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of complications and re-operations in fat grafting to healthy breast tissue compared favourably to implant-based breast augmentation. Although no increased incidence of breast cancer was found, long-term breast cancer screening and the implementation of publicly accessible registries are critically important to proving the safety of fat grafting.
Authors: Briana Garcia; Heather Francois-Vaughan; Omobola Onikoyi; Stefan Kostadinov; Monique E De Paepe; Philip A Gruppuso; Jennifer A Sanders Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Natalie N Chung; Ryan C Ransom; Charles P Blackshear; Dre M Irizarry; Derek Yen; Arash Momeni; Gordon K Lee; Dung H Nguyen; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Matthew J Davis; Aurelia T Perdanasari; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Santiago R Gonzalez; Edward Chamata; Charalambos K Rammos; Sebastian J Winocour Journal: Semin Plast Surg Date: 2020-02-15 Impact factor: 2.314
Authors: Chong Han Pek; Jane Lim; Hui Wen Ng; Han Jing Lee; Wei Chen Ong; Anthony Tun Lin Foo; Chwee Ming Lim; Mark Thong; Sandeep Jacob Sebastin; Thiam Chye Lim Journal: Arch Plast Surg Date: 2015-05-14