Literature DB >> 24394373

Report on the international workshop on alternatives to the murine histamine sensitization test (HIST) for acellular pertussis vaccines: state of the science and the path forward.

Richard Isbrucker1, Juan Arciniega2, Richard McFarland2, Jean-Michel Chapsal3, Dorothy Xing4, Christina Bache5, Sue Nelson6, Angele Costanzo7, Marieke Hoonakker8, Amélie Castiaux9, Marlies Halder10, Warren Casey11, Nelson Johnson12, Brett Jones12, Vivian Doelling12, Cathy Sprankle12, Lori Rinckel12, William Stokes11.   

Abstract

Regulatory authorities require safety and potency testing prior to the release of each production lot of acellular pertussis (aP)-containing vaccines. Currently, the murine histamine sensitization test (HIST) is used to evaluate the presence of residual pertussis toxin in aP containing vaccines. However, the testing requires the use of a significant number of mice and results in unrelieved pain and distress. NICEATM, ICCVAM, their partners in the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods, and the International Working Group for Alternatives to HIST organized a workshop to discuss recent developments in alternative assays to the HIST, review data from an international collaborative study on non-animal alternative tests that might replace the HIST, and address the path toward global acceptance of this type of method. Currently, there are three potential alternative methods to HIST. Participants agreed that no single in vitro method was sufficiently developed for harmonized validation studies at this time. It is unlikely that any single in vitro method would be applicable to all aP vaccines without modification, due to differences between vaccines. Workshop participants recommended further optimization of cell-based assays under development. Participants agreed that the next international collaborative studies should commence in 2013 based on discussions during this workshop.
Copyright © 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acellular pertussis vaccines; Alternative methods; Biochemical assays; Cell-based assays; Pertussis toxin; Safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24394373     DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2013.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biologicals        ISSN: 1045-1056            Impact factor:   1.856


  5 in total

1.  Alternatives to HIST for acellular pertussis vaccines: progress and challenges in replacement.

Authors:  J Arciniega; L Wagner; R Prymula; P Sebo; R Isbrucker; B Descampe; J M Chapsal; A Costanzo; C Hendriksen; M Hoonaker; S Nelson; K Lidster; W Casey; D Allen
Journal:  Pharmeur Bio Sci Notes       Date:  2016

Review 2.  Assays for Determining Pertussis Toxin Activity in Acellular Pertussis Vaccines.

Authors:  Kevin Markey; Catpagavalli Asokanathan; Ian Feavers
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.546

3.  The CHO Cell Clustering Response to Pertussis Toxin: History of Its Discovery and Recent Developments in Its Use.

Authors:  Mary C Gray; Richard L Guerrant; Erik L Hewlett
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 4.  In Vivo Models and In Vitro Assays for the Assessment of Pertussis Toxin Activity.

Authors:  Marieke Esther Hoonakker
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 4.546

5.  Safety testing of acellular pertussis vaccines: Use of animals and 3Rs alternatives.

Authors:  Marieke Hoonakker; Juan Arciniega; Coenraad Hendriksen
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.