Literature DB >> 24393814

Nonoperative management for perforated peptic ulcer: who can benefit?

Feng Cao1, Jia Li1, Ang Li1, Yu Fang1, Ya-Jun Wang1, Fei Li2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although nonoperative management for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) has been used for several decades, the indication is still unclear. A clinicoradiological score was sought to predict who can benefit from it.
METHODS: A clinicoradiological protocol for the assessment of patients presenting with PPU was used. A logistic regression model was applied to identify determinant variables and construct a clinical score that would identify patients who can be successfully treated with nonoperative management.
RESULTS: Of 241 consecutive patients with PPU, 107 successfully received nonoperative management, and 134 required surgery. In multivariable analysis, the following four variables correlated with surgery and were given one point each toward the clinical score: age ≥70 years, fluid collection detection by ultrasound, contrast extravasation detection by water-soluble contrast examination, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score ≥8. Eighty-five percent of patients with a score of 1 or less were successfully treated with nonoperative management, whereas 23 of 29 patients with a score of 3 or more required surgery. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.804 (95% confidence interval = 0.717-0.891).
CONCLUSION: By combining clinical, radiological parameters, and APACHE II score, the clinical score allowed early identification of PPU patients who can benefit from nonoperative management.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  perforated peptic ulcer; surgery; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24393814     DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2013.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN: 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


  7 in total

1.  Outcomes of Nonoperative Treatment for Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation: a Nationwide Study of 14,918 Inpatients in Japan.

Authors:  Takaaki Konishi; Michimasa Fujiogi; Nobuaki Michihata; Ryosuke Kumazawa; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Masahiko Tanabe; Yasuyuki Seto; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Accuracy of specific free air distributions in predicting the localization of gastrointestinal perforations.

Authors:  Hakki Celik; Mehmet Akif Kamar; Canan Altay; Isil Basara Akin; Mustafa Secil
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2021-10-11

3.  Predicting outcomes in patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers: artificial neural network modelling indicates a highly complex disease.

Authors:  K Søreide; K Thorsen; J A Søreide
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 4.  Perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Kenneth Thorsen; Ewen M Harrison; Juliane Bingener; Morten H Møller; Michael Ohene-Yeboah; Jon Arne Søreide
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the WSES 2016 consensus conference.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli; Fausto Catena; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Luca Ansaloni; Walter L Biffl; Marja A Boermeester; Marco Ceresoli; Osvaldo Chiara; Federico Coccolini; Jan J De Waele; Salomone Di Saverio; Christian Eckmann; Gustavo P Fraga; Maddalena Giannella; Massimo Girardis; Ewen A Griffiths; Jeffry Kashuk; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Vladimir Khokha; Yoram Kluger; Francesco M Labricciosa; Ari Leppaniemi; Ronald V Maier; Addison K May; Mark Malangoni; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; John Mazuski; Philippe Montravers; Andrew Peitzman; Bruno M Pereira; Tarcisio Reis; Boris Sakakushev; Gabriele Sganga; Kjetil Soreide; Michael Sugrue; Jan Ulrych; Jean-Louis Vincent; Pierluigi Viale; Ernest E Moore
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Gastric perforation following cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a case series of six.

Authors:  Lee S Kyang; Nayef A Alzahrani; Jing Zhao; David L Morris
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Operative versus non-operative management for perforated peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  Sapna Gupta; Awad Ali Alawad; Kimberly Dacosta; Adel Mahmoud; Taghreed Mohammed
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-09-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.