INTRODUCTION: Population screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) using faecal occult blood test (FOBT) will be introduced in Denmark in 2014. Prior to the implementation of the screening programme, a feasibility study was performed in 2005-2006. In this paper, occurrences of colorectal cancer in the feasibility study cohort were reviewed with respect to the effect of screening participation on stages and survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All cases of CRC in a feasibility study cohort diagnosed from the beginning of the study until two years after the study ended were identified. Differences in the distribution of colon cancer stages and rectal cancer groups between the various screening categories were analysed through χ(2)-tests. Survival analysis with respect to screening groups was done by Kaplan-Meier and Cox-Mantel hazard ratios, and survival was corrected for lead time. RESULTS: Colon cancers detected through screening were diagnosed at significantly lower stages than among screening non-responders. There were relatively fewer locally advanced rectal cancers among patients diagnosed through positive FOBT than among non-responders. Survival among screening cancer patients was superior to that of all other screening groups. No effect of lead time was detected. Neither stage nor survival among patients who had a negative FOBT was inferior to the unscreened Danish population. CONCLUSION: The positive effect on survival among screening cancer patients is neither outbalanced by more advanced cancers among FOBT-negative patients than among non-responders nor by risks reported for colonoscopy. FUNDING: not relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.
INTRODUCTION: Population screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) using faecal occult blood test (FOBT) will be introduced in Denmark in 2014. Prior to the implementation of the screening programme, a feasibility study was performed in 2005-2006. In this paper, occurrences of colorectal cancer in the feasibility study cohort were reviewed with respect to the effect of screening participation on stages and survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All cases of CRC in a feasibility study cohort diagnosed from the beginning of the study until two years after the study ended were identified. Differences in the distribution of colon cancer stages and rectal cancer groups between the various screening categories were analysed through χ(2)-tests. Survival analysis with respect to screening groups was done by Kaplan-Meier and Cox-Mantel hazard ratios, and survival was corrected for lead time. RESULTS:Colon cancers detected through screening were diagnosed at significantly lower stages than among screening non-responders. There were relatively fewer locally advanced rectal cancers among patients diagnosed through positive FOBT than among non-responders. Survival among screening cancerpatients was superior to that of all other screening groups. No effect of lead time was detected. Neither stage nor survival among patients who had a negative FOBT was inferior to the unscreened Danish population. CONCLUSION: The positive effect on survival among screening cancerpatients is neither outbalanced by more advanced cancers among FOBT-negative patients than among non-responders nor by risks reported for colonoscopy. FUNDING: not relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.
Authors: Rafael Cardoso; Feng Guo; Thomas Heisser; Harlinde De Schutter; Nancy Van Damme; Mef Christina Nilbert; Jane Christensen; Anne-Marie Bouvier; Véronique Bouvier; Guy Launoy; Anne-Sophie Woronoff; Mélanie Cariou; Michel Robaszkiewicz; Patricia Delafosse; Florence Poncet; Paul M Walsh; Carlo Senore; Stefano Rosso; Valery E P P Lemmens; Marloes A G Elferink; Sonja Tomšič; Tina Žagar; Arantza Lopez de Munain Marques; Rafael Marcos-Gragera; Montse Puigdemont; Jaume Galceran; Marià Carulla; Antonia Sánchez-Gil; María-Dolores Chirlaque; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner Journal: Lancet Reg Health Eur Date: 2022-07-06
Authors: Thomas S Kring; Thomas B Piper; Lars N Jørgensen; Jesper Olsen; Hans B Rahr; Knud T Nielsen; Søren Laurberg; Gerard Davis; Barry Dowell; Julia S Johansen; Ib J Christensen; Nils Brünner; Hans J Nielsen Journal: Biomark Cancer Date: 2015-10-22
Authors: Lisa J Croner; Roslyn Dillon; Athit Kao; Stefanie N Kairs; Ryan Benz; Ib J Christensen; Hans J Nielsen; John E Blume; Bruce Wilcox Journal: Clin Proteomics Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 3.988
Authors: Louise Rasmussen; Michael Wilhelmsen; Ib Jarle Christensen; Jens Andersen; Lars Nannestad Jørgensen; Morten Rasmussen; Jakob W Hendel; Mogens R Madsen; Jesper Vilandt; Thore Hillig; Michael Klærke; Anna-Marie Bloch Münster; Lars M Andersen; Berit Andersen; Nete Hornung; Erland J Erlandsen; Ali Khalid; Hans Jørgen Nielsen Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2016-09-13
Authors: Michael Wilhelmsen; Ib J Christensen; Lars N Jørgensen; Mogens R Madsen; Jesper Vilandt; Thore Hillig; Michael Klærke; Knud T Nielsen; Søren Laurberg; Susan Gawel; Xiaoping Yang; Gerard Davis; Anne Meike Heijboer; Frans Martens; Hans J Nielsen Journal: Biomark Cancer Date: 2018-05-30
Authors: Marcia Cruz-Correa; Frances Cordero; Jean Pierre Betancourt; Yaritza Diaz-Algorri; Sofia M Lopez; Mirza Rivera; Rafael Mosquera; Victor Carlo-Chevere; Segundo Rodriguez-Quilichini Journal: J Fam Med Dis Prev Date: 2016-08-25