Literature DB >> 24393271

Nurse-assessed metabolic monitoring: a file audit of risk factor prevalence and impact of an intervention to enhance measurement of waist circumference.

Simon Rosenbaum1, Sukh Nijjar, Andrew Watkins, Natasha Garwood, Catherine Sherrington, Anne Tiedemann.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to: (i) document the prevalence of risk factors for non-communicable diseases among mental health consumers (inpatients) with various diagnoses; and (ii) audit the frequency of waist circumference (WC) documentation before and after an intervention that involved a single nurse-education session, and change in assessment-form design. The study was undertaken in a private psychiatric hospital in Sydney, Australia. Twenty-five nurses participated in the educational intervention. File audits were performed prior to intervention delivery (n = 60), and 3 months' (n = 60), and 9 months' (n = 60) post-intervention. Files were randomly selected, and demographic (age, diagnosis) and risk factor (WC, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, blood pressure) data were extracted. WC was higher in this cohort compared to published general population means, and only 19% of patients had a BMI within the healthy range. In total, 37% of patients smoked, while 31% were hypertensive. At baseline, none of the audited files reported WC, which increased to 35 of the 60 (58%) files audited at the 3-month follow up. At the 9-month follow up, 25 of the 60 (42%) files audited reported a WC. In the 120 post-intervention files audited, only two patients refused measurement. These results illustrate the poor physical health of inpatients, and suggest that nurse-assessed metabolic monitoring can be enhanced with minimal training.
© 2014 Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anthropometry; audit; metabolic syndrome; nursing; psychiatry

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24393271     DOI: 10.1111/inm.12057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1445-8330            Impact factor:   3.503


  5 in total

1.  The Validity and Reliability Characteristics of the M-BACK Questionnaire to Assess the Barriers, Attitudes, Confidence, and Knowledge of Mental Health Staff Regarding Metabolic Health of Mental Health Service Users.

Authors:  Andrew Watkins; Simon Rosenbaum; Philip B Ward; Joanna Patching; Elizabeth Denney-Wilson; Jane Stein-Parbury
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-12-11

Review 2.  Interventions to increase access to or uptake of physical health screening in people with severe mental illness: a realist review.

Authors:  Frédérique Lamontagne-Godwin; Caroline Burgess; Sarah Clement; Melanie Gasston-Hales; Carolynn Greene; Anne Manyande; Deborah Taylor; Paul Walters; Elizabeth Barley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Test-retest reliability of the Italian version of the M-BACK questionnaire to assess the barriers, attitudes, confidence, and knowledge of mental health staff regarding metabolic health of psychiatric patients.

Authors:  Attilio Carraro; Erica Gobbi; Marco Solmi; Andrew Watkins; Philip B Ward; Simon Rosenbaum
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Barriers, attitudes, confidence, and knowledge of nurses regarding metabolic health screening and intervention in people with mental illness: a pilot study from Uganda.

Authors:  Davy Vancampfort; Andrew Watkins; Philip B Ward; Michel Probst; Marc De Hert; Tine Van Damme; James Mugisha
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 0.927

5.  Use of an electronic metabolic monitoring form in a mental health service - a retrospective file audit.

Authors:  Brenda Happell; Chris Platania-Phung; Cadeyrn J Gaskin; Robert Stanton
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.630

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.