Literature DB >> 2439296

Far-field evoked potential components induced by a propagating generator: computational evidence.

D F Stegeman, A Van Oosterom, E J Colon.   

Abstract

This study validates current hypotheses for the generation of so-called far-field or stationary somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) components. Changes in the volume conductor configuration and changes in the direction of nerve propagation are demonstrated to be capable of generating such components. Results are based on basic aspects of the theory of volume conduction. It is shown that in an essentially restricted volume conductor any disturbance of uniform nerve propagation in a homogeneous extracellular medium will lead to the generation of non-moving field components. A number of illustrative examples are presented in which intermingling of non-moving and propagating potential fields can be observed. These results can be helpful in unravelling complicated wave forms from the nervous system in which both types of potential field can be distinguished. It is shown that realistic changes within the volume conductor can lead to substantial far-field components. This type of volume conductor induced 'virtual generators' or 'secondary sources' is present in the peripheral nervous system and most probably also in the inhomogeneous structures of the brain.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2439296     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(87)90042-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  9 in total

1.  Examination of the choice of models for computing the extracellular potential of a single fibre in a restricted volume conductor.

Authors:  N Trayanova; C S Henriquez
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The propagation potential. An axonal response with implications for scalp-recorded EEG.

Authors:  A P Rudell; S E Fox
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Brainstem origins of the n18 component of the somatosensory evoked response.

Authors:  M Philips; M Kotapka; T Patterson; D C Bigelow; E Zager; E S Flamm; M Stecker
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1998

4.  Origin of P16 median nerve SEP component identified by dipole source analysis--subthalamic or within the thalamo-cortical radiation?

Authors:  H Buchner; T D Waberski; M Fuchs; H A Wischmann; R Beckmann; A Rienäcker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  ASNM position statement: intraoperative monitoring of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  William Hal Martin; Mark M Stecker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.977

6.  Classification of the extracellular fields produced by activated neural structures.

Authors:  Samantha Richerson; Mark Ingram; Danielle Perry; Mark M Stecker
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Correlates of a single cortical action potential in the epidural EEG.

Authors:  Bartosz Teleńczuk; Stuart N Baker; Richard Kempter; Gabriel Curio
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  High-resolution frequency tuning but not temporal coding in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Eric Verschooten; Christian Desloovere; Philip X Joris
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Peak I of the human auditory brainstem response results from the somatic regions of type I spiral ganglion cells: evidence from computer modeling.

Authors:  Frank Rattay; Simon M Danner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.208

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.