| Literature DB >> 24391923 |
Kimberly M Fornace1, Emily L Clark2, Sarah E Macdonald2, Boniface Namangala3, Esron Karimuribo4, Joseph A Awuni5, Olaf Thieme6, Damer P Blake2, Jonathan Rushton2.
Abstract
Small-scale commercial poultry production is emerging as an important form of livestock production in Africa, providing sources of income and animal protein to many poor households, yet the occurrence and impact of coccidiosis on this relatively new production system remains unknown. The primary objective of this study was to examine Eimeria parasite occurrence on small-scale commercial poultry farms in Ghana, Tanzania and Zambia. Additionally, farm economic viability was measured by calculating the farm gross margin and enterprise budget. Using these economic measures as global assessments of farm productivity, encompassing the diversity present in regional husbandry systems with a measure of fundamental local relevance, we investigated the detection of specific Eimeria species as indicators of farm profitability. Faecal samples and data on production parameters were collected from small-scale (less than 2,000 birds per batch) intensive broiler and layer farms in peri-urban Ghana, Tanzania and Zambia. All seven Eimeria species recognised to infect the chicken were detected in each country. Furthermore, two of the three genetic variants (operational taxonomic units) identified previously in Australia have been described outside of Australia for the first time. Detection of the most pathogenic Eimeria species associated with decreased farm profitability and may be considered as an indicator of likely farm performance. While a causal link remains to be demonstrated, the presence of highly pathogenic enteric parasites may pose a threat to profitable, sustainable small-scale poultry enterprises in Africa.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24391923 PMCID: PMC3877271 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084254
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Sampling site locations.
| Ghana | Tanzania | Zambia | |
| Income level | Lower middle | Low | Lower middle |
| National poultry population | 44.4 million | 33.5 million | 35 million |
| Sampling location | Ga East Muncipal Assembly, Greater Accra | Kibaha Town Council, Greater Dar es Salaam | Greater Lusaka area (within 50 km of Lusaka) |
| Sampling time | July 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 |
World Bank classifications [35].
FAOStat data for 2010 [36].
Pathogenicity and disease type of Eimeria species.
| Pathogenicity (Group number) | Species | Disease type |
| Low (1) |
| Malabsorptive disease |
| Medium (2) |
| Malabsorptive disease |
| High (3) |
| Haemorrhagic disease |
| Very high (4) |
| Haemorrhagic disease |
Predicted by phylogenetic comparison with the most closely related species as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1Phylogeny of Eimeria species internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2) sequences.
Phylogeny produced using Maximum Likelihood (ML), Neighbour Joining (NJ) and Maximum Parsimony (MP) algorithms with Eimeria species ITS-2 sequences generated here and publically available (GenBank accession numbers as shown, sequences generated here are indicated with an asterisk ‘*’). Bootstrap values shown for ML/NJ/MP respectively, n = 1000 for each.
The number of farms positive for Eimeria species and operational taxonomic unit (OTU) sequences on small-scale farms sampled (percentage positive shown in parentheses).
| Ghana | Tanzania | Zambia | ||||||||
| Species | Total | Broiler | Layer | Total | Broiler | Layer | Total [39] | Broiler | Layer | Village |
|
| 12 (66.7) | 6 (66.7) | 6 (66.7) | 9 (56.3) | 3 (37.5) | 6 (75.0) | 19 (48.7) | 7 (58.3) | 10 (50.0) | 2 (28.6) |
|
| 1 (5.6) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (11.1) | 2 (12.5) | 2 (25.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.6) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (5.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| 2 (11.1) | 1 (11.1) | 1 (11.1) | 4 (25.0) | 4 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (7.7) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (10.0) | 1 (14.3) |
|
| 7 (38.9) | 3 (33.3) | 4 (44.4) | 8 (50.0) | 2 (25.0) | 6 (75.0) | 2 (5.1) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (10.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| 3 (16.7) | 2 (22.2) | 1 (11.1) | 4 (25.0) | 1 (12.5) | 3 (37.5) | 8 (20.5) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (40.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| 6 (33.3) | 5 (55.6) | 1 (11.1) | 7 (43.8) | 4 (50.0) | 3 (37.5) | 8 (20.5) | 1 (8.3) | 6 (30.0) | 1 (14.3) |
|
| 7 (38.9) | 3 (33.3) | 4 (44.4) | 3 (18.8) | 2 (25.0) | 1 (12.5) | 8 (20.5) | 3 (25.0) | 3 (15.0) | 2 (28.6) |
| OTU-X like | 3 (16.7) | 1 (11.1) | 2 (22.2) | 3 (18.8) | 2 (25.0) | 1 (12.5) | 4 (10.3) | 1 (8.3) | 2 (10.0) | 1 (14.3) |
| OTU-Y like | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| OTU-Z like | 2 (11.1) | 1 (11.1) | 1 (11.1) | 3 (18.8) | 1 (12.5) | 2 (25.0) | 4 (10.3) | 1 (8.3) | 3 (15.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Any | 18 (100.0) | 9 (100.0) | 9 (100.0) | 15 (93.8) | 7 (87.5) | 8 (100.0) | 30 (76.9) | 8 (66.7) | 18 (90.0) | 4 (57.1) |
Percentages do not add to 100% due to presence of multiple species on farms.
Figure 2Number of Eimeria species identified per farm per sampled country.
Chart demonstrating the number of farms in Ghana, Tanzania and Zambia found to host one or more Eimeria species parasites. The number presented in brackets indicates the number of farms sampled.
Average farm gross margins and enterprise budgets by country sampled.
| Country | Farm type | Gross margin per bird per year (median, interquartile range) | Enterprise budget per bird per year (median, interquartile range) |
| Ghana | Broiler | $11.99 ($3.98, $15.63) | $11.99 ($3.09, $14.01) |
| Layer | $6.16 ($4.11, $11.23) | $6.11 ($4.07, $11.17) | |
| Tanzania | Broiler | $2.38 ($0.43, $3.75) | $1.26 ($0.09, $1.78) |
| Layer | $8.65 ($5.70, $11.89) | $8.38 ($2.96, $11.28) | |
| Zambia | Broiler | $25.31 ($13.43, $30.25) | $19.15 (−$0.78, $25.70) |
| Layer | −$2.49 (−$10.15, $8.41) | −$3.23 (−$11.18, $7.85) |
Figure 3Association of Eimeria detection with economic performance of African small-scale commercial poultry producers.
The economic productivity of small-scale commercial poultry farms in Ghana, Tanzania (Tanz) and Zambia (Zamb), calculated as gross margin per bird per year ($) for broiler and layer farms (B and L respectively) and categorized by the qualitative detection of individual Eimeria species parasites. OTU-Y is not included as no sequences of this genotype were detected.