| Literature DB >> 24391456 |
Chong Wang1, Zhong-Liang Chen1, Zhi-Fen Pan2, Li-Liang Wei3, Dan-Dan Xu1, Ting-Ting Jiang1, Xing Zhang1, Ze-Peng Ping1, Zhong-Jie Li1, Ji-Cheng Li1.
Abstract
The association between NOD2 and tuberculosis (TB) risk has been reported widely, but the results of previous studies remained controversial and ambiguous. To assess the association between NOD2 polymorphisms and TB risk, a meta-analysis was performed. A literature search was conducted by using the PubMed, Ovid, ISI Web of Knowledge, Elsevier ScienceDirect, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). We identified the data from all articles estimating the association between NOD2 polymorphisms and TB risk. In total, 2,215 cases and 1,491 controls in 7 case-control studies were included. In meta-analysis, we found significant association between the Arg702Trp polymorphism and TB risk (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.20-0.90, P = 0.02). However, no significant association was found between the Arg587Arg (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 0.83-2.07, P = 0.25) and Gly908Arg (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.21-2.87, P = 0.71) polymorphisms and TB risk. The present meta-analysis suggested that NOD2 Arg702Trp polymorphism was likely to be a protective factor for TB. However, the Arg587Arg and Gly908Arg polymorphisms might not be the genetic risk factors for TB susceptibility.Entities:
Keywords: NOD2; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; meta-analysis; tuberculosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24391456 PMCID: PMC3879596 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.7585
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Figure 1Flow chart showing the study selection procedure. Ovid: Ovid MEDLINE; ISI WoK: ISI Web of Knowledge; SD: Elsevier ScienceDirect; CNKI: China National Knowledge Infrastructure.
Characteristics of the 7 studies included in the meta-analysis.
| Author | Year | Country | Ethnicity | Age, years mean ± SD or mean (range) | Samples, n | Genotying method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Controls | Cases | Controls | |||||
| Austin et al | 2007 | United States | African Americans | 46.5 ± 12.9 | 45.4 ± 10.6 | 377 | 187 | PCR-sequencing |
| Möller et al | 2006 | South Africa | South Africans | 34 ± 14.8 | 27 ± 12.3 | 432 | 482 | Taq Man SNP genotyping assays |
| Singh et al | 2012 | Northern Indian states | Indians | 33.18 ± 13.29 | 36.85 ± 12.6 | 263 | 122 | PCR-RFLP |
| Stockton et al | 2004 | Gambia | Gambians | 36 (19-58) | 32 (18-50) | 320 | 320 | PCR-RFLP, PCR-FRET |
| Zhao et al_a | 2012 | China | Chinese Han | 36.47 ± 15.73 | 37.02 ± 15.29 | 219 | 215 | PCR-sequencing |
| Zhao et al_b | 2012 | China | Chinese Uygur | 28.8 ± 10.1 | 30.1 ± 8.9 | 86 | 72 | PCR-sequencing |
| Zhao et al_c | 2012 | China | Chinese Kazak | 28.8 ± 10.1 | 37.02 ± 15.29 | 120 | 93 | PCR-sequencing |
PCR = polymerase chain reaction; RFLP = restriction fragment length polymorphism; FRET = fluorescence resonance energy transfer.
Genotype and allele distribution of NOD2 polymorphisms in TB and controls.
| SNP | Study | Cases | Controls | HWE P | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT | TG | GG | T | G | TT | TG | GG | T | G | |||
| Austin et al | 377 | 0 | 0 | 754 | 0 | 187 | 0 | 0 | 374 | 0 | / | |
| Zhao et al_a | 160 | 53 | 4 | 377 | 61 | 185 | 28 | 2 | 398 | 32 | 0.423 | |
| Zhao et al_b | 49 | 29 | 8 | 127 | 45 | 37 | 29 | 6 | 103 | 41 | 0.925 | |
| Zhao et al_c | 65 | 147 | 8 | 177 | 63 | 56 | 32 | 5 | 144 | 42 | 0.878 | |
| Austin et al | 372 | 5 | 0 | 749 | 5 | 187 | 9 | 0 | 365 | 9 | 0.742 | |
| rs2066844 | Möller et al | 421 | 6 | 0 | 848 | 6 | 468 | 11 | 0 | 947 | 11 | 0.799 |
| Singh et al | 263 | 0 | 0 | 526 | 0 | 122 | 0 | 0 | 244 | 0 | / | |
| Stockton et al | 192 | 0 | 0 | 384 | 0 | 192 | 0 | 0 | 384 | 0 | / | |
| Zhao et al_a | 217 | 0 | 0 | 434 | 0 | 215 | 0 | 0 | 430 | 0 | / | |
| Zhao et al_b | 86 | 0 | 0 | 172 | 0 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 144 | 0 | / | |
| Zhao et al_c | 120 | 0 | 0 | 240 | 0 | 93 | 0 | 0 | 186 | 0 | / | |
| Austin et al | 377 | 0 | 0 | 754 | 0 | 187 | 0 | 0 | 374 | 0 | / | |
| rs2066845 | Möller et al | 426 | 2 | 0 | 854 | 2 | 476 | 4 | 0 | 956 | 4 | 0.927 |
| Singh et al | 260 | 3 | 0 | 523 | 3 | 121 | 1 | 0 | 243 | 1 | 0.926 | |
| Stockton et al | 192 | 0 | 0 | 384 | 0 | 192 | 0 | 0 | 384 | 0 | / |
HWE: Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium.
Figure 2Forrest plot of the association between NOD2 and TB risk in allele comparison. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; df: degrees of freedom. A: G vs. T of NOD2 Arg587Arg ; B: T vs. C of NOD2 Arg702Trp; C: C vs. G of NOD2 Gly908Arg.