Literature DB >> 24391355

Sequence analysis, structure and binding site prediction of Sigma 1 receptor protein by in silico method.

Narayanasamy Lokeswaran Latha1, Garimella Gyananath1, Pudukulathan Kader Zubaidha2.   

Abstract

Sigma 1 Receptor is a subtype of opioid receptor that participates in membrane remodeling and cellular differentiation in the nervous system. Sigma1 Receptor protein with amino acid length ranging from 229 is widely distributed in the liver and moderately in the intestine, kidney, white pulp of the spleen, adrenal gland, brain, placenta and the lung. In this study, the three dimensional structure for sigma 1 receptor protein has been developed by in- silico analysis based on evolutionary trace analysis of 37 sigma proteins from different sources. The present work focus on identification of functionally important residues and its interaction with antipsychotic drugs reported in literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binding sites; Evolutionary trace; Sigma receptor

Year:  2013        PMID: 24391355      PMCID: PMC3867645          DOI: 10.6026/97320630009944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformation        ISSN: 0973-2063


Background

Sigma 1 receptor is a subtype of opioid receptor that participates in membrane remodeling and cellular differentiation in the nervous system. Sigma receptors are subdivided in to 2 subtypes, sigma – 1 and sigma -2. The sigma -1 receptor is a 25K Da protein possessing one putative transmembrane domain and an endoplasmic reticulum retention signal. The cloned sigma-1 receptor reveals no homology to any known mammalian protein [1]. The amino acid sequence of sigma I receptors exhibits more than 90% identity in different mammalian species including guinea pig, human, rat, and mouse [2]. The cloned cDNA, when functionally expressed in mammalian cells, enhances the binding of sigma – 1 receptor ligands. Sigma-1 receptors contain 3 hydrophobic domains namely at the N- and the C termini, and at the center of the protein. Evolutionary Trace (ET-method) is a method in which protein sequences of a particular protein family is partitioned in to different groups, which originate from the common node in the phylogenic tree and it also involves evolutionary time cut-off. Detailed analysis on the evolutionary conservation information extracted from multiple sequence alignment is an important tool used for prediction of functional properties as well as prediction of ligands binding sites; protein interface surfaces etc, and the detection of conserved residues would be useful in identifying the functionally important residue, even in the absence of structural information. According to the ET method each residue is reported as either conserved or class specific or variable based on the conservation properties [3]. Parthiban et al has reported the use of evolutionary trace in identifying conserved and class specific residues close to the putative binding site in nocitinic acetylcholine receptors [4]. LIU Yang Don et al [5] has reported the use of evolutionary trace analysis in identifying 11 trace residues in superoxide dismutase of extremophile Thermoplasma acidophilum, of which three residues (Asn39, Gly105 and Glu162) were scattered over the structure and the rest of the residues were identified near the Fe binding site. In this work, we made an attempt to explore the information about functionally important residues of sigma -1 receptor through evolutionary conservation method and to predict the three dimensional structure of Sigma 1 protein and its interaction with antipsychotic drugs.

Methodology

Sequence analysis and ab initio structure prediction of Sigma 1 protein:

The Sigma 1 protein sequence of Homo sapiens was retrieved from NCBI (NC_). Domain and pattern were analysed using PFAM [6] and PROSITE [7] database respectively. The secondary structure of the protein was predicted using different JPRED [8], SOPM [9], SOPMA [10] and GOR4 [11] servers. The three dimensional structure of sigma 1 protein was predicted using I-TASSER server ( http: //zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/) [12]. 3D models are built based on multiplethreading alignments by LOMETS and iterative TASSER assembly simulations; function insights are then derived by matching the predicted models with protein function databases.

Evolutionary trace analysis:

A total of 74 non-redundant protein sequences of sigma-1 receptor from various organisms were retrieved from Swiss prot database. Of the 74 sequences, only 36 sequences have been selected for multiple sequence alignment and showed in Table 2 (see supplementary material). The selection criteria were based on the (a) sequences having functionally similar domains, (b) sequences with >25% sequence identity, (c) sequences with full length sigma 1 proteins were selected. We performed multiple sequence alignment for 36 Sigma 1 receptor sequences using CLUSTALW. ET analysis for Sigma 1 Receptor sequences were carried out using ET server [13].

Results & Discussion

The 223 amino acids long sigma receptor protein of Homo sapiens has an ERG2_Sigma1R. No pattern/signature could be identified from prosite database. No homologous protein with solved structure could be identified from PDB database using BLAST tool. Similarly, threading servers such as PHYRE [14] and 3DPSSM [15] also didn't identify any significant templates that could be used for developing three dimensional models for sigma 1 receptor protein. Hence, ab initio method was opted for predicting the structure of sigma 1 receptor protein. The protein sequence was submitted to I-TASSER server and five models were predicted. Of the five models, the best model was selected based on TMscore. The C-score and TM-score are -4.12 and 0.28±0.09 respectively. The predicted model was identified to have seven helices and four strands (Figure 1). Based on statistics, if a template/model has a TM-score around or below 0.17, it means the prediction is nothing more than a random selection from PDB library. Hence the predicted model is taken as a significant model.
Figure 1

Predicted three dimensional structure of sigma 1 protein.

Based on the evolutionary trace analysis, the phylogenetic tree (Figure 2) was split into 10 evenly distributed partitions, namely P01-P10 in order of evolutionary time cut-off (ETC). Analysis of the mapped traces for partitions P01-P10 revealed clusters of conserved residues occurring on the surface of the protein. Eleven residues were identified to be well conserved in the selected 37 sequences and predicted to be functionally important residues (Figure 3).
Figure 2

Vertical lines in Dendrogram A to J show different partition identity cutoffs (PICs) each PIC represents an individual group. A represents the most conserved 10th trace. As PIC increase A to J partition comprises decrease group from 10 to 1.

Figure 3

Evolutionary Trace shows conserved consensus pattern.

Active site prediction of Sigma protein and docking analysis:

The predicted sigma protein model was submitted to Q-Site server for prediction of the active site. The first predicted active site of the ten different predictions was selected based on the volume of the site. We then docked the antipsychotic compound (tBOC) into the active site of our target to understand the binding affinity of the compound. Based on the docking results, tBOC binds into the cavity of sigma 1 protein with GOLD score 40.04. The binding of tBOC to sigma 1 protein will be validated using experimental methods. We further docked our compound (tBOC) along with 23 available drug molecules available in PDB database in complex to protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B of Homo sapiens which is an important target for cancer, diabetic and obesity to understand the affinity level of our compound to that of the available molecules. Based on our results Table 1 (see supplementary material), tBOC was ranked sixth among the 23 drug molecules docked to protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B. This result predicts that tBOC has binding affinity with the protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B and can be probably an alternative drug for obesity, diabetics and cancer which has to be further confirmed through wet lab experiments. Further, docking studies were carried out for all these above mentioned 24 drug molecules to sigma 1 protein of human using GOLD software. Based on our results, 2FJ was identified to have a better affinity to sigma 1 protein (GOLD score: 76.0) when compared to tBOC (40.04) (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Docked conformation of tBOC and 2FG in the active sites of sigma 1 protein of Homo sapiens.

Conclusion

Sigma 1 Receptor protein is a potential target for studying basic mechanisms of behavioral studies were shown to be involved in higher ordered brain functions including memory and drug dependence. Since no experimental structures are available for sigma1 receptor protein, our study was first to predict the three dimensional structure of sigma 1 protein. Further we compared the binding of our compound TbOC to sigma 1 protein which proves a potential antipsychotic drug. The predicted functionally important residues and the 3D structure will be helpful for understanding the function of sigma1 receptor protein and for structure based drug designing studies.
  14 in total

1.  Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM.

Authors:  L A Kelley; R M MacCallum; M J Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06-02       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Evolutionary trace analysis of TGF-beta and related growth factors: implications for site-directed mutagenesis.

Authors:  C A Innis; J Shi; T L Blundell
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2000-12

3.  Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server.

Authors:  Lawrence A Kelley; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  JPred: a consensus secondary structure prediction server.

Authors:  J A Cuff; M E Clamp; A S Siddiqui; M Finlay; G J Barton
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  GOR method for predicting protein secondary structure from amino acid sequence.

Authors:  J Garnier; J F Gibrat; B Robson
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  SOPM: a self-optimized method for protein secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  C Geourjon; G Deléage
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-02

7.  The Pfam protein families database.

Authors:  Robert D Finn; Jaina Mistry; John Tate; Penny Coggill; Andreas Heger; Joanne E Pollington; O Luke Gavin; Prasad Gunasekaran; Goran Ceric; Kristoffer Forslund; Liisa Holm; Erik L L Sonnhammer; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Identification of the PGRMC1 protein complex as the putative sigma-2 receptor binding site.

Authors:  Jinbin Xu; Chenbo Zeng; Wenhua Chu; Fenghui Pan; Justin M Rothfuss; Fanjie Zhang; Zhude Tu; Dong Zhou; Dexing Zeng; Suwanna Vangveravong; Fabian Johnston; Dirk Spitzer; Katherine C Chang; Richard S Hotchkiss; William G Hawkins; Kenneth T Wheeler; Robert H Mach
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Binding site prediction of galanin peptide using evolutionary trace method.

Authors:  Shanthi Nagarajan; Parthiban Marimuthu
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2006-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.