Literature DB >> 24390820

Investigating the role of articulatory organs and perceptual assimilation of native and non-native fricative place contrasts.

Michael D Tyler1, Catherine T Best, Louis M Goldstein, Mark Antoniou.   

Abstract

The perceptual assimilation model (PAM; Best, C. T. [1995]. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171-204). Baltimore, MD: York Press.) accounts for developmental patterns of speech contrast discrimination by proposing that infants shift from untuned phonetic perception at 6 months to natively tuned perceptual assimilation at 11-12 months, but the model does not predict initial discrimination differences among contrasts. To address that issue, we evaluated the Articulatory Organ Hypothesis, which posits that consonants produced using different articulatory organs are initially easier to discriminate than those produced with the same articulatory organ. We tested English-learning 6- and 11-month-olds' discrimination of voiceless fricative place contrasts from Nuu-Chah-Nulth (non-native) and English (native), with one within-organ and one between-organ contrast from each language. Both native and non-native contrasts were discriminated across age, suggesting that articulatory-organ differences do not influence perception of speech contrasts by young infants. The results highlight the fact that a decline in discrimination for non-native contrasts does not always occur over age.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  articulatory organs; cross-language speech perception; fricatives; infants; native-language attunement; perceptual assimilation model; perceptual narrowing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24390820     DOI: 10.1002/dev.21195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychobiol        ISSN: 0012-1630            Impact factor:   3.038


  7 in total

Review 1.  How Tone, Intonation and Emotion Shape the Development of Infants' Fundamental Frequency Perception.

Authors:  Liquan Liu; Antonia Götz; Pernelle Lorette; Michael D Tyler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-03

Review 2.  Infant perceptual development for faces and spoken words: an integrated approach.

Authors:  Tamara L Watson; Rachel A Robbins; Catherine T Best
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.038

3.  Limits on Monolingualism? A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Infants' Abilities to Integrate Lexical Tone in Novel Word Learning.

Authors:  Leher Singh; Felicia L S Poh; Charlene S L Fu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-10

4.  Articulating What Infants Attune to in Native Speech.

Authors:  Catherine T Best; Louis M Goldstein; Hosung Nam; Michael D Tyler
Journal:  Ecol Psychol       Date:  2016-11-01

5.  Pitch Perception in the First Year of Life, a Comparison of Lexical Tones and Musical Pitch.

Authors:  Ao Chen; Catherine J Stevens; René Kager
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-09

6.  Discrimination of Multiple Coronal Stop Contrasts in Wubuy (Australia): A Natural Referent Consonant Account.

Authors:  Rikke L Bundgaard-Nielsen; Brett J Baker; Christian H Kroos; Mark Harvey; Catherine T Best
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  One Way or Another: Evidence for Perceptual Asymmetry in Pre-attentive Learning of Non-native Contrasts.

Authors:  Liquan Liu; Jia Hoong Ong; Alba Tuninetti; Paola Escudero
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.