Literature DB >> 24390714

Heuristic and analytic processing in online sports betting.

Alain d'Astous1, Marc Di Gaspero.   

Abstract

This article presents the results of two studies that examine the occurrence of heuristic (i.e., intuitive and fast) and analytic (i.e., deliberate and slow) processes among people who engage in online sports betting on a regular basis. The first study was qualitative and was conducted with a convenience sample of 12 regular online sports gamblers who described the processes by which they arrive at a sports betting decision. The results of this study showed that betting online on sports events involves a mix of heuristic and analytic processes. The second study consisted in a survey of 161 online sports gamblers where performance in terms of monetary gains, experience in online sports betting, propensity to collect and analyze relevant information prior to betting, and use of bookmaker odds were measured. This study showed that heuristic and analytic processes act as mediators of the relationship between experience and performance. The findings stemming of these two studies give some insights into gamblers' modes of thinking and behaviors in an online sports betting context and show the value of the dual mediation process model for research that looks at gambling activities from a judgment and decision making perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24390714     DOI: 10.1007/s10899-013-9438-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gambl Stud        ISSN: 1050-5350


  8 in total

1.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment.

Authors:  H A SIMON
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Sports betting: can gamblers beat randomness?

Authors:  Michael Cantinotti; Robert Ladouceur; Christian Jacques
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2004-06

Review 3.  Heuristic decision making.

Authors:  Gerd Gigerenzer; Wolfgang Gaissmaier
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect.

Authors:  Ap Dijksterhuis; Maarten W Bos; Loran F Nordgren; Rick B van Baaren
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Pathological gambling: A review of the literature (prepared for the American Psychiatric Association task force on DSM-IV committee on disorders of impulse control not elsewhere classified).

Authors:  H R Lesieur; R J Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  1991-03

6.  Skill versus luck: A motivational analysis of gambling involvement.

Authors:  Y Chantal; R J Vallerand
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  1996-12

7.  Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling.

Authors:  T Gilovich
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1983-06

Review 8.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition.

Authors:  Jonathan St B T Evans
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

  8 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Gamble with Your Head and Not Your Heart: A Conceptual Model for How Thinking-Style Promotes Irrational Gambling Beliefs.

Authors:  Tess Armstrong; Matthew Rockloff; Matthew Browne
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2020-03

2.  Comparison of risk and protective factors associated with smartphone addiction and Internet addiction.

Authors:  Sam-Wook Choi; Dai-Jin Kim; Jung-Seok Choi; Heejune Ahn; Eun-Jeung Choi; Won-Young Song; Seohee Kim; Hyunchul Youn
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.756

3.  The Relationship Between In-Play Betting and Gambling Problems in an Australian Context of Prohibited Online In-Play Betting.

Authors:  Sally Melissa Gainsbury; Brett Abarbanel; Alex Blaszczynski
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Why Do Individuals Engage in In-Play Sports Betting? A Qualitative Interview Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Killick; Mark D Griffiths
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2021-03

Review 5.  The Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling: A revised framework for understanding gambling harm.

Authors:  Margo Hilbrecht; David Baxter; Max Abbott; Per Binde; Luke Clark; David C Hodgins; Darrel Manitowabi; Lena Quilty; Jessika SpÅngberg; Rachel Volberg; Douglas Walker; Robert J Williams
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 6.756

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.