Literature DB >> 24389374

A readability assessment of online stroke information.

Nikhil Sharma1, Andreas Tridimas2, Paul R Fitzsimmons2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients and carers increasingly access the Internet as a source of health information. Poor health literacy is extremely common and frequently limits patient's comprehension of health care information literature. We aimed to assess the readability of online consumer-orientated stroke information using 2 validated readability measures.
METHODS: The 100 highest Google ranked consumer-oriented stroke Web pages were assessed for reading difficulty using the Flesch-Kincaid and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) formulae.
RESULTS: None of the included Web pages complied with the current readability guidelines when readability was measured using the gold standard SMOG formula. Mean Flesch-Kincaid grade level was 10.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.97-10.9) and mean SMOG grade 12.1 (95% CI 11.7-12.4). Over half of the Web pages were produced at graduate reading levels or above. Not-for-profit Web pages were significantly easier to read (P=.0006). The Flesch-Kincaid formula significantly underestimated reading difficulty, with a mean underestimation of 1.65 grades (95% CI 1.49-1.81), P<.0001.
CONCLUSIONS: Most consumer-orientated stroke information Web sites require major text revision to comply with readability guidelines and to be comprehensible to the average patient. The Flesch-Kincaid formula significantly underestimates reading difficulty, and SMOG should be used as the measure of choice.
Copyright © 2014 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Internet; Stroke; literacy; online; readability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24389374     DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1052-3057            Impact factor:   2.136


  9 in total

1.  Initial Readability Assessment of Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria.

Authors:  Tian Kang; Noémie Elhadad; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

2.  Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.

Authors:  Sarah Mozafarpour; Briony Norris; James Borin; Brian H Eisner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Quality of information available via the internet for patients with head and neck cancer: are we improving?

Authors:  James Best; Jameel Muzaffar; Alistair Mitchell-Innes
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Access to and Use of Internet and Social Media by Low-Morbidity Stroke Survivors Participating in a National Web-Based Secondary Stroke Prevention Trial: Cross-sectional Survey.

Authors:  Brigid Clancy; Billie Bonevski; Coralie English; Amanda L Baker; Alyna Turner; Parker Magin; Michael Pollack; Robin Callister; Ashleigh Guillaumier
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 7.076

5.  Quality and Health Literacy Demand of Online Heart Failure Information.

Authors:  Maan Isabella Cajita; Tamar Rodney; Jingzhi Xu; Melissa Hladek; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  Online health information seeking by adults hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes: Who looks for information, and who discusses it with healthcare providers?

Authors:  Molly E Waring; David D McManus; Daniel J Amante; Chad E Darling; Catarina I Kiefe
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-06-30

7.  The role of social networks in diabetes self-care: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Khadijeh Moulaei; Zahra Dinari; Fatemeh Dinari; Yunes Jahani; Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-26

8.  Patients' Use of Social Media for Diabetes Self-Care: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Abdelaziz Elnaggar; Van Ta Park; Sei J Lee; Melinda Bender; Lee Anne Siegmund; Linda G Park
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Trustworthiness, Readability, and Suitability of Web-Based Information for Stroke Prevention and Self-Management for Korean Americans: Critical Evaluation.

Authors:  Mikyoung A Lee; Cha-Nam Shin; Kyungeh An
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2018-07-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.