Literature DB >> 24389088

Results of the Queensland 2007-2012 roadside drug testing program: The prevalence of three illicit drugs.

Jeremy Davey1, Kerry Armstrong2, Peter Martin3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation is to present an overview of roadside drug driving enforcement and detections in Queensland, Australia since the introduction of oral fluid screening. Drug driving is a problematic issue for road safety and investigations of the prevalence and impact of drug driving suggest that, in particular, the use of illicit drugs may increase a driver's involvement in a road crash when compared to a driver who is drug free. In response to the potential increased crash involvement of drug impaired drivers, Australian police agencies have adopted the use of oral fluid analysis to detect the presence of illicit drugs in drivers. This paper describes the results of roadside drug testing for over 80,000 drivers in Queensland, Australia, from December 2007 to June 2012. It provides unique data on the prevalence of methamphetamine, cannabis and ecstasy in the screened population for the period. When prevalence rates are examined over time, drug driving detection rates have almost doubled from around 2.0% at the introduction of roadside testing operations to just under 4.0% in the latter years. The most common drug type detected was methamphetamine (40.8%) followed by cannabis (29.8%) and methamphetamine/cannabis combination (22.5%). By comparison, the rate of ecstasy detection was very low (1.7%). The data revealed a number of regional, age and gender patterns and variations of drug driving across the state. Younger drivers were more likely to test positive for cannabis whilst older drivers were more likely to test positive for methamphetamine. The overall characteristics of drivers who tested positive to the presence of at least one of the target illicit drugs are they are likely to be male, aged 30-39 years, be driving a car on Friday, Saturday or Sunday between 6:00 pm and 6:00 am and to test positive for methamphetamine.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drug driving; Enforcement; Roadside drug testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24389088     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  3 in total

1.  Trends in methamphetamine and opioid use among clients of needle-syringe programs in Queensland, Australia: 2007-2015.

Authors:  Brendan Jacka; Robert Kemp; Louisa Degenhardt; Amy Peacock; Philip Clare; Raimondo Bruno; Abhilash Dev; Oluwadamisola Sotade; Briony Larance
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2019-02-13

2.  Amphetamine-type stimulant use and conditional paths of consumption: data from the Second Brazilian National Alcohol and Drugs Survey.

Authors:  Luciana T S Massaro; Renata R Abdalla; Ronaldo Laranjeira; Raul Caetano; Ilana Pinsky; Clarice S Madruga
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.697

3.  Drivers who tested positive for cannabis in oral fluid: a longitudinal analysis of administrative data for Spain between 2011 and 2016.

Authors:  Francisco Herrera-Gómez; Mercedes García-Mingo; Mónica Colás; Juan Carlos González-Luque; F Javier Alvarez
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.