Literature DB >> 24388976

Modulation of left primary motor cortex excitability after bimanual training and intermittent theta burst stimulation to left dorsal premotor cortex.

Jason L Neva1, Michael Vesia2, Amaya M Singh1, W Richard Staines3.   

Abstract

Bimanual visuomotor movement training (BMT) enhances the excitability of human preparatory premotor and primary motor (M1) cortices compared to unimanual movement. This occurs when BMT involves mirror symmetrical movements of both upper-limbs (in-phase) but not with non-symmetrical movements (anti-phase). The neural mechanisms mediating the effect of BMT is unclear, but may involve interhemispheric connections between homologous M1 representations as well as the dorsal premotor cortices (PMd). The purpose of this study is to assess how intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) of the left PMd affects left M1 excitability, and the possible combined effects of iTBS to left PMd applied before a single session of BMT. Left M1 excitability was quantified using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in terms of both the amplitudes and spatial extent of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) for the extensor carpi radialis (ECR) before and multiple time points following (1) BMT, (2) iTBS to left PMd or (3) iTBS to left PMd and BMT. Although there was not a greater increase in either specific measure of M1 excitability due to the combination of the interventions, iTBS applied before BMT showed that both the spatial extent and global MEP amplitude for the ECR became larger in parallel, whereas the spatial extent was enhanced with BMT alone and global MEP amplitude was enhanced with iTBS to left PMd alone. These results suggest that the modulation of rapid functional M1 excitability associated with BMT and iTBS of the left PMd could operate under related early markers of neuro-plastic mechanisms, which may be expressed in concurrent and distinct patterns of M1 excitability. Critically, this work may guide rehabilitation training and stimulation techniques that modulate cortical excitability after brain injury.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bimanual training; Cortical excitability; In-phase movements; Spatial map; TMS

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24388976     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.12.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  4 in total

1.  Rethinking stimulation of the brain in stroke rehabilitation: why higher motor areas might be better alternatives for patients with greater impairments.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 7.519

2.  tDCS over left M1 or DLPFC does not improve learning of a bimanual coordination task.

Authors:  Kathleen Vancleef; Raf Meesen; Stephan P Swinnen; Hakuei Fujiyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Effectiveness of Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation versus Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Functional Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Songhua Huang; Peile Liu; Yinglun Chen; Beiyao Gao; Yingying Li; Chan Chen; Yulong Bai
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 4.  A Review of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Multimodal Neuroimaging to Characterize Post-Stroke Neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Angela M Auriat; Jason L Neva; Sue Peters; Jennifer K Ferris; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.