Literature DB >> 24388842

Application of intermittent galvanic vestibular stimulation reveals age-related constraints in the multisensory reweighting of posture.

Diderik J A Eikema1, Vassilia Hatzitaki2, Dimitrios Tzovaras3, Charalambos Papaxanthis4.   

Abstract

In this study we examined the effects of intermittent short-duration Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS) during a multisensory perturbation of posture in young and elderly adults. Twelve young (24.91±6.44 years) and eleven elderly (74.8±6.42 years) participants stood upright under two task conditions: (a) quiet standing and (b) standing while receiving pseudo-randomly presented bipolar 2 s GVS pulses. In both conditions, sensory reweighting was evoked by visual surround oscillations (20 cm, 0.3 Hz) and Achilles tendon vibration (3 mm, 80 Hz), concurrently delivered during the middle 60 s of standing. Intermittent GVS decreased the excessive postural sway induced by the concurrent visual and proprioceptive perturbation in young but not in elderly participants. It is suggested that GVS increases sensory reliance on the vestibular system while elderly adults are less able to exploit this stimulation in order to reduce the destabilizing effect of the multisensory perturbation on their posture.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Galvanic vestibular stimulation; Posture; Proprioception; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24388842     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.12.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  14 in total

1.  Processing time of addition or withdrawal of single or combined balance-stabilizing haptic and visual information.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Oscar Crisafulli; Stefania Sozzi; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Ankle muscle activity modulation during single-leg stance differs between children, young adults and seniors.

Authors:  Eduard Kurz; Oliver Faude; Ralf Roth; Lukas Zahner; Lars Donath
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Elderly Use Proprioception Rather than Visual and Vestibular Cues for Postural Motor Control.

Authors:  Isabella Katharina Wiesmeier; Daniela Dalin; Christoph Maurer
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.750

4.  Comparison of postural responses to galvanic vestibular stimulation between pilots and the general populace.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Fang Pu; Xiaoning Lv; Shuyu Li; Jing Li; Deyu Li; Minggao Li; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Balance Training Enhances Vestibular Function and Reduces Overactive Proprioceptive Feedback in Elderly.

Authors:  Isabella K Wiesmeier; Daniela Dalin; Anja Wehrle; Urs Granacher; Thomas Muehlbauer; Joerg Dietterle; Cornelius Weiller; Albert Gollhofer; Christoph Maurer
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  Gaze stabilization exercises derive sensory reweighting of vestibular for postural control.

Authors:  Yusuke Ueta; Akiyoshi Matsugi; Kosuke Oku; Kojiro Okuno; Yoshiki Tamaru; Shohei Nomura; Hiroaki Tanaka; Shinya Douchi; Nobuhiko Mori
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-09-15

7.  Vestibular Adaptations Induced by Gentle Physical Activity Are Reduced Among Older Women.

Authors:  Julien Maitre; Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 8.  Effects of Aging in Multisensory Integration: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alix L de Dieuleveult; Petra C Siemonsma; Jan B F van Erp; Anne-Marie Brouwer
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Postural Effects of Vestibular Manipulation Depend on the Physical Activity Status.

Authors:  Julien Maitre; Thierry Paillard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Center of Pressure Motion After Calf Vibration Is More Random in Fallers Than Non-fallers: Prospective Study of Older Individuals.

Authors:  Wolbert van den Hoorn; Graham K Kerr; Jaap H van Dieën; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.