Atul B Shinagare1, Jyothi P Jagannathan2, Vikram Kurra2, Trinity Urban2, Judith Manola2, Edwin Choy2, George D Demetri2, Suzanne George2, Nikhil H Ramaiya2. 1. Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Ludwig Center and Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, United States. Electronic address: ashinagare@partners.org. 2. Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Ludwig Center and Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare performance of various tumour response criteria (TRCs) in assessment of regorafenib activity in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) with prior failure of imatinib and sunitinib. METHODS: Twenty participants in a phase II trial received oral regorafenib (median duration 47 weeks; interquartile range (IQR) 24-88) with computed tomography (CT) imaging at baseline and every two months thereafter. Tumour response was prospectively determined on using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1, and retrospectively reassessed for comparison per RECIST 1.0, World Health Organization (WHO) and Choi criteria, using the same target lesions. Clinical benefit rate [CBR; complete or partial response (CR or PR) or stable disease (SD)≥16 weeks] and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between various TRCs using kappa statistics. Performance of TRCs in predicting overall survival (OS) was compared by comparing OS in groups with progression-free intervals less than or greater than 20 weeks by each TRC using c-statistics. RESULTS: PR was more frequent by Choi (90%) than RECIST 1.1, RECIST 1.0 and WHO (20% each), however, CBR was similar between various TRCs (overall CBR 85-90%, 95-100% agreement between all TRC pairs). PFS per RECIST 1.0 was similar to RECIST 1.1 (median 44 weeks versus 58 weeks), and shorter for WHO (median 34 weeks) and Choi (median 24 weeks). With RECIST 1.1, RECIST 1.0 and WHO, there was moderate concordance between PFS and OS (c-statistics 0.596-0.679). Choi criteria had less favourable concordance (c-statistic 0.506). CONCLUSIONS: RECIST 1.1 and WHO performed somewhat better than Choi criteria as TRC for response evaluation in patients with advanced GIST after prior failure on imatinib and sunitinib.
PURPOSE: To compare performance of various tumour response criteria (TRCs) in assessment of regorafenib activity in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) with prior failure of imatinib and sunitinib. METHODS: Twenty participants in a phase II trial received oral regorafenib (median duration 47 weeks; interquartile range (IQR) 24-88) with computed tomography (CT) imaging at baseline and every two months thereafter. Tumour response was prospectively determined on using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1, and retrospectively reassessed for comparison per RECIST 1.0, World Health Organization (WHO) and Choi criteria, using the same target lesions. Clinical benefit rate [CBR; complete or partial response (CR or PR) or stable disease (SD)≥16 weeks] and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between various TRCs using kappa statistics. Performance of TRCs in predicting overall survival (OS) was compared by comparing OS in groups with progression-free intervals less than or greater than 20 weeks by each TRC using c-statistics. RESULTS: PR was more frequent by Choi (90%) than RECIST 1.1, RECIST 1.0 and WHO (20% each), however, CBR was similar between various TRCs (overall CBR 85-90%, 95-100% agreement between all TRC pairs). PFS per RECIST 1.0 was similar to RECIST 1.1 (median 44 weeks versus 58 weeks), and shorter for WHO (median 34 weeks) and Choi (median 24 weeks). With RECIST 1.1, RECIST 1.0 and WHO, there was moderate concordance between PFS and OS (c-statistics 0.596-0.679). Choi criteria had less favourable concordance (c-statistic 0.506). CONCLUSIONS: RECIST 1.1 and WHO performed somewhat better than Choi criteria as TRC for response evaluation in patients with advanced GIST after prior failure on imatinib and sunitinib.
Authors: George D Demetri; Allan T van Oosterom; Christopher R Garrett; Martin E Blackstein; Manisha H Shah; Jaap Verweij; Grant McArthur; Ian R Judson; Michael C Heinrich; Jeffrey A Morgan; Jayesh Desai; Christopher D Fletcher; Suzanne George; Carlo L Bello; Xin Huang; Charles M Baum; Paolo G Casali Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-10-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Suzanne George; Qian Wang; Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless; Meijun Zhu; James E Butrynski; Jeffrey A Morgan; Andrew J Wagner; Edwin Choy; William D Tap; Jeffrey T Yap; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Judith B Manola; Sarah M Solomon; Jonathan A Fletcher; Margaret von Mehren; George D Demetri Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-05-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert S Benjamin; Haesun Choi; Homer A Macapinlac; Michael A Burgess; Shreyaskumar R Patel; Lei L Chen; Donald A Podoloff; Chuslip Charnsangavej Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Haesun Choi; Chuslip Charnsangavej; Silvana C Faria; Homer A Macapinlac; Michael A Burgess; Shreyaskumar R Patel; Lei L Chen; Donald A Podoloff; Robert S Benjamin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Axel Le Cesne; Martine Van Glabbeke; Jaap Verweij; Paolo G Casali; Michael Findlay; Peter Reichardt; Rolf Issels; Ian Judson; Patrick Schoffski; Serge Leyvraz; Binh Bui; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Raf Sciot; Jean-Yves Blay Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Charles D Blanke; George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Michael C Heinrich; Burton Eisenberg; Jonathan A Fletcher; Christopher L Corless; Christopher D M Fletcher; Peter J Roberts; Daniela Heinz; Elisabeth Wehre; Zariana Nikolova; Heikki Joensuu Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Charles D Blanke; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Burton Eisenberg; Peter J Roberts; Michael C Heinrich; David A Tuveson; Samuel Singer; Milos Janicek; Jonathan A Fletcher; Stuart G Silverman; Sandra L Silberman; Renaud Capdeville; Beate Kiese; Bin Peng; Sasa Dimitrijevic; Brian J Druker; Christopher Corless; Christopher D M Fletcher; Heikki Joensuu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rachel P Riechelmann; Luiz S Leite; Giovanni M Bariani; Joao Glasberg; Thomas G Rivelli; Leonardo Gomes da Fonseca; Daniela R Nebuloni; Maria I Braghiroli; Marcelo A Queiroz; Alice M Isejima; Christian Kappeler; Luciana Kikuchi; Paulo M Hoff Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-06-07
Authors: Attila Kollàr; Marco Maruzzo; Christina Messiou; Elisabeth Cartwright; Aisha Miah; Juan Martin-Liberal; Khin Thway; Ellen McGrath; Alison Dunlop; Komel Khabra; Beatrice Seddon; Palma Dileo; Mark Linch; Ian Judson; Charlotte Benson Journal: Clin Sarcoma Res Date: 2014-12-04