Literature DB >> 24388718

Implant survival and prosthetic complications of mandibular metal-acrylic resin implant complete fixed dental prostheses.

George Priest1, Jay Smith2, Michael G Wilson3.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF
PURPOSE: This study examined and recorded the long-term implant survival and prosthetic complications of patients treated with mandibular metal-acrylic resin implant complete fixed dental prostheses delivered in a private practice setting over a 22-year period.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Records were examined for all patients in the authors' private prosthodontic practices who between April 1988 and April 2011 had received mandibular metal-acrylic resin implant complete fixed dental prostheses supported by 4 to 8 implants and who had completed at least 1 year of follow-up after implant placement.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients who had received a total of 247 implants met the inclusion criteria. In the course of the 1- to 22-year follow-up period (mean 8 years and 3 months), only 2 implants failed (0.81%) in 1 patient before definitive prosthetic reconstruction, which resulted in a cumulative implant survival rate of 97.78% ±2.2%. No screws were found to be loose or fractured. Individual denture-tooth fracture and chairside repair occurred 10 times in 5 patients. Because of wear, all the teeth had to be replaced by the laboratory 10 times in 8 patients between 5 and 12 years. Framework fractures occurred 6 times and affected 3 prostheses (twice for each of the 3 patients).
CONCLUSIONS: Implant failure was rare with this traditional mode of treatment and occurred before definitive restoration. The replacement of denture teeth due to wear or fracture was the most common prosthetic complication, and cantilevered frameworks exhibited a high risk of fracture when opposed by fixed prostheses. No fractures occurred for any of the frameworks opposed by complete dentures or removable implant prostheses.
Copyright © 2014 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24388718     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  3 in total

1.  Implant-supported hybrid prosthesis: Conventional treatment method for borderline cases.

Authors:  Ferhan Egilmez; Gulfem Ergun; Isil Cekic-Nagas; Suleyman Bozkaya
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

2.  The Prosthetic Complications and the Survival of the Implant-Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses: An Original Study.

Authors:  Nag Bhushan Mandal; Akanksha Kumari; Bhavan Chand Yemineni; Manish Airan; Rahul V C Tiwari; Rajesh Damarasingu; Heena Dixit Tiwari
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2022-07-13

3.  Complications of Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic Prostheses.

Authors:  Ignacio Gonzalez-Gonzalez; Hector deLlanos-Lanchares; Aritza Brizuela-Velasco; Jose-Antonio Alvarez-Riesgo; Santiago Llorente-Pendas; Mariano Herrero-Climent; Angel Alvarez-Arenal
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.