Alexander S Parker1, Jeanette E Eckel-Passow2, Daniel Serie3, Tracy Hilton3, Mansi Parasramka4, Richard W Joseph5, Kevin J Wu6, John C Cheville7, Bradley C Leibovich8. 1. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. Electronic address: parker.alexander@mayo.edu. 2. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 3. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 4. Department of Cancer Basic Science, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 5. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 6. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 7. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 8. Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumor-based biomarkers of outcome for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remain limited, especially for those with low-risk disease. Type IIa topoisomerase (TOPOIIa) is a well-known biomarker of DNA replication and a target for antineoplastic agents, but it has not been evaluated as a biomarker of ccRCC outcome. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of TOPOIIa expression in ccRCC and risk of cancer-specific death following surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Two independent cohort studies were studied in tertiary referral urology practices in the United States. We identified cohorts of 1378 (analytic) and 279 (validation) patients who underwent nephrectomy for clinically localized ccRCC and had paraffin tumor tissue available. TOPOIIa expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry and scored as the number of positive cells per square millimeter. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Our primary end point was cancer-specific survival (CSS). We evaluated TOPOIIa expression as a continuous variable and dichotomized as low versus high. For associations with CSS, we used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In both cohorts, patients who had high TOPOIIa expression were approximately three times more likely to experience ccRCC death than those with low expression (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.12-3.56; p=1.79E-14 and HR: 3.45; 95% CI, 1.34-8.88; p=0.0104, respectively). Multivariable adjustment for pathologic features of aggressiveness did not explain these associations, and stratified analysis suggests that the association is more pronounced among patients with low-risk disease as defined by the Mayo Clinic SSIGN (stage, size, grade, and necrosis) score. CONCLUSIONS: Higher TOPOIIa expression is independently associated with increased risk of cancer death among patients undergoing surgery for ccRCC, and the prognostic value is pronounced among patients with low-risk disease. Evaluation of TOPOIIa in ccRCC provides the opportunity to help guide postsurgical surveillance for ccRCC patients as well as inform the design of more targeted clinical trials and novel treatment strategies.
BACKGROUND:Tumor-based biomarkers of outcome for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remain limited, especially for those with low-risk disease. Type IIa topoisomerase (TOPOIIa) is a well-known biomarker of DNA replication and a target for antineoplastic agents, but it has not been evaluated as a biomarker of ccRCC outcome. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of TOPOIIa expression in ccRCC and risk of cancer-specific death following surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Two independent cohort studies were studied in tertiary referral urology practices in the United States. We identified cohorts of 1378 (analytic) and 279 (validation) patients who underwent nephrectomy for clinically localized ccRCC and had paraffintumor tissue available. TOPOIIa expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry and scored as the number of positive cells per square millimeter. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Our primary end point was cancer-specific survival (CSS). We evaluated TOPOIIa expression as a continuous variable and dichotomized as low versus high. For associations with CSS, we used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In both cohorts, patients who had high TOPOIIa expression were approximately three times more likely to experience ccRCC death than those with low expression (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.12-3.56; p=1.79E-14 and HR: 3.45; 95% CI, 1.34-8.88; p=0.0104, respectively). Multivariable adjustment for pathologic features of aggressiveness did not explain these associations, and stratified analysis suggests that the association is more pronounced among patients with low-risk disease as defined by the Mayo Clinic SSIGN (stage, size, grade, and necrosis) score. CONCLUSIONS: Higher TOPOIIa expression is independently associated with increased risk of cancer death among patients undergoing surgery for ccRCC, and the prognostic value is pronounced among patients with low-risk disease. Evaluation of TOPOIIa in ccRCC provides the opportunity to help guide postsurgical surveillance for ccRCC patients as well as inform the design of more targeted clinical trials and novel treatment strategies.
Authors: Michael B Atkins; David E Avigan; Ronald M Bukowski; Richard W Childs; Janice P Dutcher; Tim G Eisen; Robert A Figlin; James H Finke; Robert C Flanigan; Daniel J George; S Nahum Goldberg; Michael S Gordon; Othon Iliopoulos; William G Kaelin; W Marston Linehan; Allan Lipton; Robert J Motzer; Andrew C Novick; Walter M Stadler; Bin Tean Teh; James C Yang; Laura King Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-09-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Alexander S Parker; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Todd Igel; Bradley C Leibovich; Michael L Blute Journal: Urology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Marina França de Resende; Samantha Vieira; Ludmilla Thomé Domingos Chinen; Francesco Chiappelli; Francisco Paulo da Fonseca; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; Fernando Augusto Soares; Ivan Neves; Simone Pagotty; Peter A Pellionisz; Andre Barkhordarian; Xenia Brant; Rafael Malagoli Rocha Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2013-02-11 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Richard W Joseph; Payal Kapur; Daniel J Serie; Mansi Parasramka; Thai H Ho; John C Cheville; Eugene Frenkel; Alexander S Parker; James Brugarolas Journal: J Urol Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: William P Parker; John C Cheville; Igor Frank; Harras B Zaid; Christine M Lohse; Stephen A Boorjian; Bradley C Leibovich; R Houston Thompson Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Xian Hua Gao; Juan Li; Yan Liu; Qi Zhi Liu; Li Qiang Hao; Lian Jie Liu; Wei Zhang Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Elisa Neubauer; Ralph M Wirtz; Daniel Kaemmerer; Maria Athelogou; Lydia Schmidt; Jörg Sänger; Amelie Lupp Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-07-05