Literature DB >> 24388283

Increased transcranial direct current stimulation after effects during concurrent peripheral electrical nerve stimulation.

Vincenzo Rizzo1, Carmen Terranova1, Domenica Crupi2, Antonino Sant'angelo3, Paolo Girlanda1, Angelo Quartarone4.   

Abstract

In this study we tested the hypothesis whether a lasting change in the excitability of cortical output circuits can be obtained in healthy humans by combining a peripheral nerve stimulation during a concomitant depolarization and/or hyperpolarization of motor cortex. To reach this aim we combined two different neurophysiological techniques each of them able to induce a lasting increase of cortical excitability by them self: namely median nerve repetitive electrical stimulation (rEPNS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Ten normal young volunteers were enrolled in the present study. All subjects underwent five different protocols of stimulation: (1, 2) tDCS alone (anodal or cathodal); (3) Sham tDCS plus rEPNS; (4, 5) anodal or cathodal tDCS plus rEPNS. The baseline MEP amplitude from abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle, the FCR H-reflex were compared with that obtained immediately after and 10, 20, 30, 60 min after the stimulation protocol. Anodal tDCS alone induced a significant transient increase of MEP amplitude immediately after the end of stimulation while anodal tDCS + rEPNS determined MEP changes which persisted for up 60 min. Cathodal tDCS alone induced a significant reduction of MEP amplitude immediately after the end of stimulation while cathodal tDCS + rEPNS prolonged the effects for up to 60 min. Sham tDCS + rEPNS did not induce significant changes in corticospinal excitability. Anodal or cathodal tDCS + rEPNS and sham tDCS + rEPNS caused a lasting facilitation of H-reflex. These findings suggest that by providing afferent input to the motor cortex while its excitability level is increased or decreased by tDCS may be a highly effective means for inducing an enduring bi-directional plasticity. The mechanism of this protocol may be complex, involving either cortical and spinal after effects.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motor cortex; Peripheral electrical current stimulation; Plasticity; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24388283     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  9 in total

1.  Influence of Concurrent Finger Movements on Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)-Induced Aftereffects.

Authors:  Yuichiro Shirota; Daniella Terney; Andrea Antal; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.558

2.  Addition of transcranial direct current stimulation to quadriceps strengthening exercise in knee osteoarthritis: A pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Wei-Ju Chang; Kim L Bennell; Paul W Hodges; Rana S Hinman; Carolyn L Young; Valentina Buscemi; Matthew B Liston; Siobhan M Schabrun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The effect of combined transcranial direct current stimulation and peripheral nerve electrical stimulation on corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  Shota Tsuiki; Ryoki Sasaki; Shota Miyaguchi; Sho Kojima; Kei Saito; Yasuto Inukai; Mitsuhiro Masaki; Naofumi Otsuru; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  An Established Early Rehabilitation Therapy Demonstrating Higher Efficacy and Safety for Care of Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Authors:  Yatao Pang; Hongling Li; Long Zhao; Chunxia Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-09-20

5.  The effect of combined transcranial pulsed current stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on lower limb spasticity in children with spastic cerebral palsy: a randomized and controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Zhenhuan Liu; Shangsheng Dong; Sandra Zhong; Fang Huang; Chuntao Zhang; Yuan Zhou; Haorong Deng
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  Visuo-motor integration in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: A piece of the puzzle towards consciousness detection?

Authors:  Antonino Naro; Antonino Leo; Serena Filoni; Placido Bramanti; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Immediate effect of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with functional electrical stimulation on activity of the tibialis anterior muscle and balance of individuals with hemiparesis stemming from a stroke.

Authors:  Aline Marina Alves Fruhauf; Fabiano Politti; Simone Dal Corso; Gláucio Carneiro Costa; Amanda da Conceição Teodósio; Soraia Micaela Silva; João Carlos Ferrari Corrêa; Fernanda Ishida Corrêa
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-12-07

8.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on patients with disorders of consciousness after traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind controlled trial.

Authors:  Shilin Li; Xiangli Dong; Weiming Sun; Na Zhao; Guohua Yu; Lang Shuai
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Why brain-controlled neuroprosthetics matter: mechanisms underlying electrical stimulation of muscles and nerves in rehabilitation.

Authors:  Matija Milosevic; Cesar Marquez-Chin; Kei Masani; Masayuki Hirata; Taishin Nomura; Milos R Popovic; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.819

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.