Literature DB >> 24388007

Meta-analysis of selenium accumulation and expression of antioxidant enzymes in chicken tissues.

E Zoidis1, N Demiris2, A Kominakis3, A C Pappas1.   

Abstract

A meta-analysis integrating results of 40 selenium (Se) supplementation experiments that originated from 35 different controlled randomized trials was carried out in an attempt to identify significant factors that affect tissue Se accumulation in chicken. Examined factors included: Se source (12 different sources examined), type of chicken (laying hens or broilers), age of birds at the beginning of supplementation, duration of supplementation, year during which the study was conducted, sex of birds, number of chickens per treatment, method of analysis, tissue type, concentration of Se determined and Se added to feed. A correlation analysis was also carried out between tissue Se concentration and glutathione peroxidase activity. Data analysis showed that the factors significantly affecting tissue Se concentration include type of chicken (P=0.006), type of tissue (P<0.001) and the analytical method used (P=0.014). Although Se source was not found to affect tissue Se concentration (overall P>0.05), certain inorganic (sodium selenite), calcium selenite, sodium selenate and organic sources (B-Traxim Se), Se-yeast, Se-malt, Se-enriched cabbage and Se-enriched garlic as well as background Se level from feed ingredients were found to significantly affect tissue Se concentration. The Se accumulation rate (estimated as linear regression coefficient of Se concentrations to Se added to feed) discriminated between the various tissues with highest values estimated in the leg muscle and lowest in blood plasma. Correlation analysis has also shown that tissue Se concentration (pooled data) was correlated to Se added to feed (r=0.529, P<0.01, log values) and to glutathione peroxidase activity (r=0.332, P=0.0478), with the latter not being correlated with Se added to feed. Although significant factors affecting Se concentration were reported in the present study, they do not necessarily indicate the in vivo function of the antioxidant system or the level of accumulated Se as other factors, not examined in the present study, may interact at the level of trace element absorption, distribution and retention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24388007     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731113002395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  6 in total

1.  Effect of different selenium sources and concentrations on glutathione peroxidase activity and cholesterol metabolism of beef cattle.

Authors:  Janaina S da Silva; Alessandra F Rosa; Cristina T Moncau; Bárbara Silva-Vignato; Silvana Marina P Pugine; Mariza P de Melo; João Marcelo D Sanchez; Marcus Antonio Zanetti
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The Selenium Yeast vs Selenium Methionine on Cell Viability, Selenoprotein Profile and Redox Status via JNK/ P38 Pathway in Porcine Mammary Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Caichi Wu; Chang Cui; Xiaoyu Zheng; Jun Wang; Ziwei Ma; Pengwei Zhu; Gang Lin; Shihai Zhang; Wutai Guan; Fang Chen
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  Lack of Evidence That Selenium-Yeast Improves Chicken Health and Modulates the Caecal Microbiota in the Context of Colonization by Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Alexandre Thibodeau; Ann Letellier; Étienne Yergeau; Guillaume Larrivière-Gauthier; Philippe Fravalo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Meta-analysis of the effects of intensive rearing environments on the performance and welfare of broiler chickens.

Authors:  X Averós; I Estevez
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  New horizons for selenium in animal nutrition and functional foods.

Authors:  Xin Gu; Chun-Qi Gao
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2022-07-05

6.  The influence of selenium and selenoproteins on immune responses of poultry and pigs.

Authors:  Tina S Dalgaard; Mickaël Briens; Ricarda M Engberg; Charlotte Lauridsen
Journal:  Anim Feed Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.247

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.