Akeem A Yusuf1, Eric D Weinhandl2, Wendy L St Peter3. 1. US Renal Data System, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN; University of Minnesota, College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN. 2. US Renal Data System, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN. 3. US Renal Data System, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN; University of Minnesota, College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN. Electronic address: wstpeter@usrds.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phosphate binders are an important therapeutic option for managing hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients. Whether sevelamer confers a survival advantage over calcium acetate is unclear. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study using US Renal Data System (USRDS) data linked to Medicare Part D prescription drug data. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Medicare-enrolled elderly incident hemodialysis patients initiating calcium acetate or sevelamer therapy between July 1, 2006, and March 31, 2011. PREDICTOR: Prescription for sevelamer (hydrochloride or carbonate) or calcium acetate. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: All-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality, hospital admissions and hospital days assessed from Medicare Parts A, B, and D claims and other USRDS data. RESULTS: The sevelamer and calcium-acetate groups included 16,916 and 18,335 patients, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, all-cause (21.9 vs 21.8 deaths/100 patient-years; adjusted HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.03) and cardiovascular (8.7 vs 8.6 deaths/100 patient-years; HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.04) mortality did not differ significantly between the sevelamer and calcium-acetate (referent) groups. Mortality results in propensity score-matched cohorts showed significantly lower risk of death in sevelamer- than in calcium-acetate-treated patients (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.98). Mortality results from additional analyses including only patients with low-income subsidy status were consistent with results from analyses including patients with and without low-income subsidy status. There were no significant differences between the sevelamer and calcium-acetate groups for all-cause and cardiovascular-related first hospitalization, multiple hospitalizations, and hospital days. LIMITATIONS: Results may not be applicable to younger patients; information about laboratory data and over-the-counter calcium-containing binders was lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to treatment with calcium acetate, treatment with sevelamer was associated with similar or slightly lower risk of death and similar risk of hospitalization in elderly incident hemodialysis patients.
BACKGROUND:Phosphate binders are an important therapeutic option for managing hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients. Whether sevelamer confers a survival advantage over calcium acetate is unclear. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study using US Renal Data System (USRDS) data linked to Medicare Part D prescription drug data. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Medicare-enrolled elderly incident hemodialysis patients initiating calcium acetate or sevelamer therapy between July 1, 2006, and March 31, 2011. PREDICTOR: Prescription for sevelamer (hydrochloride or carbonate) or calcium acetate. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: All-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality, hospital admissions and hospital days assessed from Medicare Parts A, B, and D claims and other USRDS data. RESULTS: The sevelamer and calcium-acetate groups included 16,916 and 18,335 patients, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, all-cause (21.9 vs 21.8 deaths/100 patient-years; adjusted HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.03) and cardiovascular (8.7 vs 8.6 deaths/100 patient-years; HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.04) mortality did not differ significantly between the sevelamer and calcium-acetate (referent) groups. Mortality results in propensity score-matched cohorts showed significantly lower risk of death in sevelamer- than in calcium-acetate-treated patients (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.98). Mortality results from additional analyses including only patients with low-income subsidy status were consistent with results from analyses including patients with and without low-income subsidy status. There were no significant differences between the sevelamer and calcium-acetate groups for all-cause and cardiovascular-related first hospitalization, multiple hospitalizations, and hospital days. LIMITATIONS: Results may not be applicable to younger patients; information about laboratory data and over-the-counter calcium-containing binders was lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to treatment with calcium acetate, treatment with sevelamer was associated with similar or slightly lower risk of death and similar risk of hospitalization in elderly incident hemodialysis patients.
Authors: A J Bleyer; S K Burke; M Dillon; B Garrett; K S Kant; D Lynch; S N Rahman; P Schoenfeld; I Teitelbaum; S Zeig; E Slatopolsky Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Geoffrey A Block; David M Spiegel; James Ehrlich; Ravindra Mehta; Jill Lindbergh; Albert Dreisbach; Paolo Raggi Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Wajeh Y Qunibi; Robert E Hootkins; Laveta L McDowell; Micah S Meyer; Matthias Simon; Rodolfo O Garza; Russell W Pelham; Mark V B Cleveland; Larry R Muenz; David Y He; Charles R Nolan Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: J Braun; H G Asmus; H Holzer; R Brunkhorst; R Krause; W Schulz; H-H Neumayer; P Raggi; J Bommer Journal: Clin Nephrol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 0.975
Authors: Magdalene M Assimon; M Alan Brookhart; Jason P Fine; Gerardo Heiss; J Bradley Layton; Jennifer E Flythe Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Julia Spoendlin; Julie M Paik; T Tsacogianis; Seoyoung C Kim; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Rishi J Desai Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Uma N Srivatsa; K Swaminathan; K Sithy Athiya Munavarah; Ezra Amsterdam; K Shantaraman Journal: Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Date: 2016-10-22