M V Franchi1, P J Atherton, N D Reeves, M Flück, J Williams, W K Mitchell, A Selby, R M Beltran Valls, M V Narici. 1. School of Graduate Entry Medicine and Health, MRC-ARUK Centre of Excellence for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK; School of Healthcare Science, Institute for Biomedical Research into Human Movement and Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
AIM: We investigated architectural, functional and molecular responses of human skeletal muscle to concentric (CON) or eccentric (ECC) resistance training (RT). METHODS: Twelve young males performed 10 weeks of concentric (CON) or eccentric (ECC) resistance training (RT) (n = 6 CON, 6 ECC). An additional 14 males were recruited to evaluate acute muscle fascicle behaviour and molecular signalling in biopsies collected from vastus lateralis (VL) after 30 min of single bouts of CON or ECC exercise. VL volume was measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Muscle architecture (fascicle length, Lf; pennation angle, PA) was evaluated by ultrasonography. Muscle remodelling signals to CON or ECC loading [MAPK/AKT-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling] and inflammatory pathway (TNFαMurf-1-MAFbx) were evaluated by immunoblotting. RESULTS: Despite the ~1.2-fold greater load of the ECC group, similar increases in muscle volume (+8% CON and +6% ECC) and in maximal voluntary isometric contraction (+9% CON and +11% ECC) were found after RT. However, increases in Lf were greater after ECC than CON (+12 vs. +5%) while increases in PA were greater in CON than ECC (+30 vs. +5%). Distinct architectural adaptations were associated with preferential growth in the distal regions of VL for ECC (+ECC +8% vs. +CON +2) and mid belly for CON (ECC +7 vs. CON +11%). While MAPK activation (p38MAPK, ERK1/2, p90RSK) was specific to ECC, neither mode affected AKT-mTOR or inflammatory signalling 30 min after exercise. CONCLUSION: Muscle growth with CON and ECC RT occurs with different morphological adaptations reflecting distinct fibre fascicle behaviour and molecular responses.
AIM: We investigated architectural, functional and molecular responses of human skeletal muscle to concentric (CON) or eccentric (ECC) resistance training (RT). METHODS: Twelve young males performed 10 weeks of concentric (CON) or eccentric (ECC) resistance training (RT) (n = 6 CON, 6 ECC). An additional 14 males were recruited to evaluate acute muscle fascicle behaviour and molecular signalling in biopsies collected from vastus lateralis (VL) after 30 min of single bouts of CON or ECC exercise. VL volume was measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Muscle architecture (fascicle length, Lf; pennation angle, PA) was evaluated by ultrasonography. Muscle remodelling signals to CON or ECC loading [MAPK/AKT-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling] and inflammatory pathway (TNFαMurf-1-MAFbx) were evaluated by immunoblotting. RESULTS: Despite the ~1.2-fold greater load of the ECC group, similar increases in muscle volume (+8% CON and +6% ECC) and in maximal voluntary isometric contraction (+9% CON and +11% ECC) were found after RT. However, increases in Lf were greater after ECC than CON (+12 vs. +5%) while increases in PA were greater in CON than ECC (+30 vs. +5%). Distinct architectural adaptations were associated with preferential growth in the distal regions of VL for ECC (+ECC +8% vs. +CON +2) and mid belly for CON (ECC +7 vs. CON +11%). While MAPK activation (p38MAPK, ERK1/2, p90RSK) was specific to ECC, neither mode affected AKT-mTOR or inflammatory signalling 30 min after exercise. CONCLUSION: Muscle growth with CON and ECC RT occurs with different morphological adaptations reflecting distinct fibre fascicle behaviour and molecular responses.
Authors: John P Wagle; Christopher B Taber; Aaron J Cunanan; Garett E Bingham; Kevin M Carroll; Brad H DeWeese; Kimitake Sato; Michael H Stone Journal: Sports Med Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Kayla D Seymore; Zachary J Domire; Paul DeVita; Patrick M Rider; Anthony S Kulas Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Maria João Valamatos; Francisco Tavares; Rute M Santos; António P Veloso; Pedro Mil-Homens Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2018-07-07 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Nathan Hodson; Daniel W D West; Andrew Philp; Nicholas A Burd; Daniel R Moore Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Jean Farup; Stine Klejs Rahbek; Simon Riis; Mikkel Holm Vendelbo; Frank de Paoli; Kristian Vissing Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2014-08-07