PURPOSE: The current study examines the influence of contextual and provider-level factors on the implementation fidelity of a research-based substance abuse prevention program. Also, it investigates whether two provider-level factors, self-efficacy and beliefs about the value of the program, statistically moderate and mediate the effects of a provider training intervention on implementation fidelity. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Using generalized mixed-linear modeling, we examine relationships between program provider-, organizational, and community-level factors and implementation fidelity in a sample of 50 high school teachers from 43 high schools in 8 states across the U.S. Fidelity of implementation was assessed utilizing an observation procedure. FINDINGS: Implementation fidelity was negatively associated with the urbanicity of the community and the level of teachers' beliefs about the value of the program, and positively predicted by the organizational capacity of the school. Comprehensive training significantly increased teachers' self-efficacy, which resulted in an increase in implementation fidelity. RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS: School-based prevention program implementation is influenced by a variety of contextual factors occurring at multiple ecological levels. Future effectiveness and dissemination studies need to account for the complex nature of schools in analyses of implementation fidelity and outcomes. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that both provider- and organizational-level factors are influential in promoting implementation fidelity. Before implementation begins, as well as throughout the implementation process, training and ongoing technical assistance should be conducted to increase teachers' skills, self-efficacy, and comfort with prevention curricula. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The present study is one of the few to examine contextual and provider-level correlates of implementation fidelity and use mediation analyses to explore whether provider-level factors mediate the effects of a provider training intervention on implementation fidelity.
PURPOSE: The current study examines the influence of contextual and provider-level factors on the implementation fidelity of a research-based substance abuse prevention program. Also, it investigates whether two provider-level factors, self-efficacy and beliefs about the value of the program, statistically moderate and mediate the effects of a provider training intervention on implementation fidelity. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Using generalized mixed-linear modeling, we examine relationships between program provider-, organizational, and community-level factors and implementation fidelity in a sample of 50 high school teachers from 43 high schools in 8 states across the U.S. Fidelity of implementation was assessed utilizing an observation procedure. FINDINGS: Implementation fidelity was negatively associated with the urbanicity of the community and the level of teachers' beliefs about the value of the program, and positively predicted by the organizational capacity of the school. Comprehensive training significantly increased teachers' self-efficacy, which resulted in an increase in implementation fidelity. RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS: School-based prevention program implementation is influenced by a variety of contextual factors occurring at multiple ecological levels. Future effectiveness and dissemination studies need to account for the complex nature of schools in analyses of implementation fidelity and outcomes. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that both provider- and organizational-level factors are influential in promoting implementation fidelity. Before implementation begins, as well as throughout the implementation process, training and ongoing technical assistance should be conducted to increase teachers' skills, self-efficacy, and comfort with prevention curricula. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The present study is one of the few to examine contextual and provider-level correlates of implementation fidelity and use mediation analyses to explore whether provider-level factors mediate the effects of a provider training intervention on implementation fidelity.
Authors: Jean L Wiecha; Alison M El Ayadi; Bernard F Fuemmeler; Jill E Carter; Shirley Handler; Stacy Johnson; Nancy Strunk; Debra Korzec-Ramirez; Steven L Gortmaker Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2004-09
Authors: Christopher L Ringwalt; Susan Ennett; Ruby Johnson; Louise Ann Rohrbach; Ashley Simons-Rudolph; Amy Vincus; Judy Thorne Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2003-06
Authors: Melissa A Little; Nathaniel R Riggs; Hee-Sung Shin; Eleanor B Tate; Mary Ann Pentz Journal: Eval Health Prof Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Jennifer Leeman; Larissa Calancie; Marieke A Hartman; Cam T Escoffery; Alison K Herrmann; Lindsay E Tague; Alexis A Moore; Katherine M Wilson; Michelle Schreiner; Carmen Samuel-Hodge Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Carmen Orte; Lidia Sánchez-Prieto; Juan José Montaño; Belén Pascual Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 3.390