Literature DB >> 24386602

Radiological anatomical consideration of conjoined nerve root with a case review.

Chang Hyun Oh1, Jae Suk Park2, Won-Seok Choi1, Eunhwa Choi3, Gyu Yeul Ji4.   

Abstract

Nerve root anomalies are frequently underrecognized regardless of the advances in imaging studies; they are also underappreciated and underreported when encountered surgically. The classification of conjoined nerve roots is based on whether the nerve root emerges at an abnormal level or from an anastomotic branch. In the present report, we describe case with a conjoined nerve root that emerged at a more caudal level than that normally observed that was an undiagnosed on preoperative imaging studies. We also discuss the atypical imaging features obtained through preoperative imaging studies. As observed in the present case, preoperative recognition and diagnosis of such anomalies offer the best opportunity of performing a successful procedure and preventing inadvertent damage to nerve roots intraoperatively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conjoined nerve roots; Corner sign; Fat crescent sign; Parallel sign; Sagittal shoulder sign

Year:  2013        PMID: 24386602      PMCID: PMC3875847          DOI: 10.5115/acb.2013.46.4.291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Cell Biol        ISSN: 2093-3665


  10 in total

1.  Conjoined lumbar nerve roots: a frequently underappreciated congenital abnormality.

Authors:  Gaetano J Scuderi; Alexander R Vaccaro; Georgiy V Brusovanik; Brian K Kwon; Scott C Berta
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-04

2.  Imaging features suggestive of a conjoined nerve root on routine axial MRI.

Authors:  Su Jin Song; Joon Woo Lee; Ja-Young Choi; Sung Hwan Hong; Na Ra Kim; Ki-Jeong Kim; Sang-Ki Chung; Hyun-Jib Kim; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots: observations on three cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  M Artico; S Carloia; M Piacentini; G Ferretti; M Dazzi; S Franchitto; E Bronzetti
Journal:  Neurocirugia (Astur)       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.553

4.  The frequency of intradural conjoined lumbosacral dorsal nerve roots found during selective dorsal rhizotomy.

Authors:  L H Phillips; T S Park
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Surgical treatment of 63 cases of conjoined nerve roots.

Authors:  J G White; T A Strait; J R Binkley; S E Hunter
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Clinical features of conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots versus lumbar intervertebral disc herniations.

Authors:  R Lotan; A Al-Rashdi; A Yee; J Finkelstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Conjoined nerve roots of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Roman Trimba; Jeffrey M Spivak; John A Bendo
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots compromised by disk herniation: sagittal shoulder sign for the preoperative diagnosis.

Authors:  Chang Ho Kang; Myung Jin Shin; Sung Moon Kim; Sang Hoon Lee; Hee Kyung Kim; Jeong Ah Ryu; Choon-Sung Lee; Sam Soo Kim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots.

Authors:  J G Gomez; J W Dickey; T B Bachow
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Lumbosacral nerve-root anomalies.

Authors:  F Postacchini; S Urso; L Ferro
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.284

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  [Conjoined nerve root: about a case].

Authors:  Yannick Canton Kessely; Maguette Gaye Sakho; Alidji Fondo; Akerey Diop Daisy; Aley Thiam; Youssoupha Sakho
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-02-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.