| Literature DB >> 24386340 |
Jun Wang1, Dafeng Hui2, Hai Ren1, Zhanfeng Liu1, Long Yang3.
Abstract
Establishing seedlings in subtropical plantations is very important for forest health, succession and management. Information on seedling nutrient concentrations is essential for both the selection of suitable indigenous tree species to accelerate succession of the established plantation and sustainable forest management. In this study, we investigated the concentrations of nitrogen ([N]), phosphorus ([P]), and N:P ratio in leaves, stems and roots of seedlings of three indigenous tree species (Castanopsis chinensis, Michelia chapensis and Psychotria rubra) transplanted with removing or retaining understory vegetation and litter at two typical subtropical forest plantations (Eucalyptus plantation and native species plantation). We also measured the relative growth rate (RGR) of seedling height, and developed the relationships between RGR and leaf [N], [P] and N:P ratio. Results showed that treatments of understory vegetation and associated litter (i.e. removal or retained) generally had no significant effects on leaf [N], [P], N:P ratio and RGR of the transplanted tree seedlings for the experimental period. But among different species, there were significant differences in nutrient concentrations. M. chapensis and P. rubra had higher [N] and [P] compared to C. chinensis. [N] and [P] also varied among different plant tissues with much higher values in leaves than in roots for all indigenous species. RGR of indigenous tree seedlings was mostly positively correlated with leaf [N] and [P], but negatively correlated with leaf N:P ratio. Considering the low [P] and high N:P ratio observed in the introduced indigenous tree seedlings, we propose that the current experimental plantations might be P limited for plant growth.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24386340 PMCID: PMC3873957 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The dominant understory species and its coverage, standing litter biomass, soil properties, and light penetration at the two plantations.
| Plantation | Dominant understory species | Coverage (%) | Standing litter biomass (g/m2) | Light penetration (%) | Soil organic matter (g/kg) | Soil hydrolyzed nitrogen (mg/kg) | Soil available phosphorus (mg/kg) |
| EP |
| 29.3±5.2a | 361±38b | 12.4±2.1a | 1.38±0.01a | 105.8±8.1a | 1.97±1.04a |
| P |
| 40.0±15.2a | 877±107a | 9.4±2.2a | 1.55±0.10a | 101.3±5.9a | 1.82±0.40a |
Values are means ± standard errors and are based on data collected just before the experiment began and from plots where vegetation and litter were not removed.
Means in a column followed by different letters are significantly different (p<0.05) according to t-test. EP, Eucalyptus plantation; NP, Native species plantation.
Figure 1Concentration of nitrogen ([N]), phosphorus ([P]), and N:P ratio in the leaves, stems and roots of C. chinensis, M. chapensis and P. rubra seedlings treated with removal (VR) or retention (CK) of understory vegetation and litter at the two plantations.
ANOVAs for the effects of treatment (removing or retaining understory vegetation and litter), species and plant tissue on the concentration of nitrogen ([N]), phosphorus ([P]), and N∶P ratio at the two plantations.
| Source of Variation |
| [N] | [P] | N∶P ratio | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| |||||||
| Treatment (T) | 1 | 2.084 | 0.156 | 3.400 | 0.072 | 0.713 | 0.403 |
| Species (S) | 2 | 10.273 |
| 11.380 |
| 3.865 |
|
| Plant tissue (PT) | 2 | 67.433 |
| 23.406 |
| 15.560 |
|
| T×S | 2 | 1.469 | 0.242 | 0.247 | 0.782 | 2.774 | 0.074 |
| T×PT | 2 | 0.911 | 0.410 | 0.514 | 0.602 | 0.678 | 0.513 |
| S×PT | 4 | 2.363 | 0.068 | 2.339 | 0.071 | 2.060 | 0.103 |
| T×S×PT | 4 | 0.626 | 0.647 | 0.451 | 0.771 | 0.151 | 0.962 |
| Native species plantation | |||||||
| Treatment (T) | 1 | 1.819 | 0.184 | 12.872 |
| 9.764 |
|
| Species (S) | 2 | 90.766 |
| 103.731 |
| 7.741 |
|
| Plant tissue (PT) | 2 | 146.099 |
| 29.763 |
| 12.876 |
|
| T×S | 2 | 1.547 | 0.223 | 2.804 | 0.070 | 8.192 |
|
| T×PT | 2 | 0.456 | 0.636 | 0.252 | 0.778 | 2.229 | 0.118 |
| S×PT | 4 | 2.100 | 0.095 | 4.030 |
| 1.062 | 0.385 |
| T×S×PT | 4 | 0.192 | 0.941 | 1.064 | 0.384 | 3.097 |
|
F-ratios and significance values for treatment, species, plant tissue and their interactions are given (significant results in bold).
Figure 2Relative growth rate (RGR) of height for transplanted C. chinensis, M. chapensis, and P. rubra seedlings affected by removing (VR) or retaining (CK) understory vegetation and litter at the two plantations.
EP: Eucalyptus plantation; NP: native species plantation.
Figure 3Relationship between RGR of height and leaf [N], [P] and N∶P ratio for the transplanted C. chinensis, M. chapensis, and P. rubra seedlings.