Literature DB >> 24385641

How representative is the ACTIVE sample? A statistical comparison of the ACTIVE sample and the HRS sample.

John J Prindle1, John J McArdle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This research is designed to examine demographic differences between the ACTIVE sample and the larger, nationally representative Health and Retirement Study (HRS) sample.
METHOD: After describing some relevant demographics (age, education, sex, and race/ethnicity), we use three statistical methods to determine sample differences--logistic regression modeling (LRM), decision tree analysis (DTA), and post-stratification and raking methods. When some differences are found, we create sample weights that other researchers can use to adjust these differences.
RESULTS: The ACTIVE sample is younger, more likely to be female, Black, and more highly educated than the HRS sample. Sample weights were created. DISCUSSION: By using the resulting sample weights, all results of ACTIVE analyses can be said to be nationally representative based on HRS demographics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACTIVE; demographics; nationally representative sample; sample weights; statistical methods

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24385641      PMCID: PMC3882341          DOI: 10.1177/0898264313497795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aging Health        ISSN: 0898-2643


  13 in total

1.  Comparative longitudinal structural analyses of the growth and decline of multiple intellectual abilities over the life span.

Authors:  John J McArdle; Emilio Ferrer-Caja; Fumiaki Hamagami; Richard W Woodcock
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2002-01

2.  ACTIVE: a cognitive intervention trial to promote independence in older adults.

Authors:  J B Jobe; D M Smith; K Ball; S L Tennstedt; M Marsiske; S L Willis; G W Rebok; J N Morris; K F Helmers; M D Leveck; K Kleinman
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2001-08

3.  Can longitudinal changes in processing speed explain longitudinal age changes in fluid intelligence?

Authors:  Daniel Zimprich; Mike Martin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-12

Review 4.  Training and maintaining memory abilities in healthy older adults: traditional and novel approaches.

Authors:  George W Rebok; Michelle C Carlson; Jessica B S Langbaum
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults.

Authors:  Sherry L Willis; Sharon L Tennstedt; Michael Marsiske; Karlene Ball; Jeffrey Elias; Kathy Mann Koepke; John N Morris; George W Rebok; Frederick W Unverzagt; Anne M Stoddard; Elizabeth Wright
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Age difference patterns of psychometric intelligence in adulthood: generalizability within and across ability domains.

Authors:  K W Schaie; S L Willis
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1993-03

7.  Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence.

Authors:  J L Horn; R B Cattell
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1967

8.  Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karlene Ball; Daniel B Berch; Karin F Helmers; Jared B Jobe; Mary D Leveck; Michael Marsiske; John N Morris; George W Rebok; David M Smith; Sharon L Tennstedt; Frederick W Unverzagt; Sherry L Willis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Latent variable analyses of age trends of cognition in the Health and Retirement Study, 1992-2004.

Authors:  John J McArdle; Gwenith G Fisher; Kelly M Kadlec
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2007-09

10.  Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cohort Profile: Hong Kong Department of Health Elderly Health Service Cohort.

Authors:  C M Schooling; W M Chan; S L Leung; T H Lam; S Y Lee; C Shen; J Y Leung; G M Leung
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Disparities in the participation and adherence of older adults in lifestyle-based multidomain dementia prevention and the motivational role of perceived disease risk and intervention benefits: an observational ancillary study to a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicola Coley; Delphine Coniasse-Brioude; Valérie Igier; Tristan Fournier; Jean-Pierre Poulain; Sandrine Andrieu
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 6.982

3.  Recruitment and baseline characteristics of participants in the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER)-a randomized controlled lifestyle trial.

Authors:  Tiia Ngandu; Jenni Lehtisalo; Esko Levälahti; Tiina Laatikainen; Jaana Lindström; Markku Peltonen; Alina Solomon; Satu Ahtiluoto; Riitta Antikainen; Tuomo Hänninen; Antti Jula; Francesca Mangialasche; Teemu Paajanen; Satu Pajala; Rainer Rauramaa; Timo Strandberg; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Hilkka Soininen; Miia Kivipelto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.