BACKGROUND: Evidence on the adverse effects of work stress on quality of life (QoL) is largely derived from general populations, while respective information is lacking for people with disabilities. We investigated associations between work stress and QoL and the potentially moderating role of socioeconomic circumstances in employed persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: Cross-sectional data from 386 employed men and women with SCI (≥18 work h/week) from the Netherlands, Switzerland, Denmark, and Norway were analyzed. Work stress was assessed with the 'effort-reward imbalance' (ERI) model and the control component of the 'demand/control' model. QoL was operationalized with five WHOQoL BREF items. Socioeconomic circumstances were measured by years of formal education and perception of financial hardship. We applied ordinal and linear regressions to predict QoL and introduced interaction terms to assess a potential moderation of socioeconomic circumstances. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses showed consistent associations between increased ERI and decreased overall QoL (coefficient -1.55, p < 0.001), domain-specific life satisfaction (health -1.32, p < 0.001; activities of daily living -1.28, p < 0.001; relationships -0.84, p = 0.004; living conditions -1.05, p < 0.001), and the QoL sum score (-2.40, p < 0.001). Low job control was linked to decreased general QoL (0.13, p = 0.015), satisfaction with relationships (0.15, p = 0.004), and QoL sum score (0.15, p = 0.029). None of the tested interaction terms were significant. CONCLUSION: ERI was consistently related to all indicators of QoL, while associations with job control were less consistent. Our results do not support the notion that unfavorable socioeconomic circumstances moderate the association between work stress and QoL among persons with SCI.
BACKGROUND: Evidence on the adverse effects of work stress on quality of life (QoL) is largely derived from general populations, while respective information is lacking for people with disabilities. We investigated associations between work stress and QoL and the potentially moderating role of socioeconomic circumstances in employed persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: Cross-sectional data from 386 employed men and women with SCI (≥18 work h/week) from the Netherlands, Switzerland, Denmark, and Norway were analyzed. Work stress was assessed with the 'effort-reward imbalance' (ERI) model and the control component of the 'demand/control' model. QoL was operationalized with five WHOQoL BREF items. Socioeconomic circumstances were measured by years of formal education and perception of financial hardship. We applied ordinal and linear regressions to predict QoL and introduced interaction terms to assess a potential moderation of socioeconomic circumstances. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses showed consistent associations between increased ERI and decreased overall QoL (coefficient -1.55, p < 0.001), domain-specific life satisfaction (health -1.32, p < 0.001; activities of daily living -1.28, p < 0.001; relationships -0.84, p = 0.004; living conditions -1.05, p < 0.001), and the QoL sum score (-2.40, p < 0.001). Low job control was linked to decreased general QoL (0.13, p = 0.015), satisfaction with relationships (0.15, p = 0.004), and QoL sum score (0.15, p = 0.029). None of the tested interaction terms were significant. CONCLUSION: ERI was consistently related to all indicators of QoL, while associations with job control were less consistent. Our results do not support the notion that unfavorable socioeconomic circumstances moderate the association between work stress and QoL among persons with SCI.
Authors: Suzan J W Robroek; Merel Schuring; Simone Croezen; Mikael Stattin; Alex Burdorf Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2012-09-03 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Marcel W M Post; Martin W G Brinkhof; Erik von Elm; Christine Boldt; Mirjam Brach; Christine Fekete; Inge Eriks-Hoogland; Armin Curt; Gerold Stucki Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: J O'Neill; M R Hibbard; M Brown; M Jaffe; M Sliwinski; D Vandergoot; M J Weiss Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Mika Kivimäki; Solja T Nyberg; G David Batty; Eleonor I Fransson; Katriina Heikkilä; Lars Alfredsson; Jakob B Bjorner; Marianne Borritz; Hermann Burr; Annalisa Casini; Els Clays; Dirk De Bacquer; Nico Dragano; Jane E Ferrie; Goedele A Geuskens; Marcel Goldberg; Mark Hamer; Wendela E Hooftman; Irene L Houtman; Matti Joensuu; Markus Jokela; France Kittel; Anders Knutsson; Markku Koskenvuo; Aki Koskinen; Anne Kouvonen; Meena Kumari; Ida E H Madsen; Michael G Marmot; Martin L Nielsen; Maria Nordin; Tuula Oksanen; Jaana Pentti; Reiner Rugulies; Paula Salo; Johannes Siegrist; Archana Singh-Manoux; Sakari B Suominen; Ari Väänänen; Jussi Vahtera; Marianna Virtanen; Peter J M Westerholm; Hugo Westerlund; Marie Zins; Andrew Steptoe; Töres Theorell Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Seyed Mohammad Alavinia; Arif Jetha; Sander L Hitzig; Diana McCauley; François Routhier; Vanessa K Noonan; Gary Linassi; Farnoosh Farahani; Maryam Omidvar; Gaya Jeyathevan; B Catharine Craven Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2021 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Christian Sturm; Christoph M Gutenbrunner; Christoph Egen; Veronika Geng; Christina Lemhöfer; Yorck B Kalke; Christoph Korallus; Roland Thietje; Thomas Liebscher; Rainer Abel; Andrea Bökel Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: A Fattori; L Neri; E Aguglia; A Bellomo; A Bisogno; D Camerino; B Carpiniello; A Cassin; G Costa; P De Fazio; G Di Sciascio; G Favaretto; C Fraticelli; R Giannelli; S Leone; T Maniscalco; C Marchesi; M Mauri; C Mencacci; G Polselli; R Quartesan; F Risso; A Sciaretta; M Vaggi; S Vender; U Viora Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-10-18 Impact factor: 3.411