Literature DB >> 24384727

[Dying with/despite a pacemaker].

S Reith1, U Janssens.   

Abstract

Death of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) is a common scenario in the ICU. Given the demographic trends and the increasing implantation rate of such devices reinforces the fact that ICU physicians must be aware of the burden and consequences of these systems in the end of life care of dying patients. The possible deactivation of a CIED confronts the responsible physicians with particularly complex clinical, ethical, and legal problems. Most deaths are often preceded by a long illness trajectory and finally by altering the therapeutic goals. Withholding or withdrawing therapy are the results of these processes. General agreement exists that ICD deactivation in dying patients may be ethically permissible. The patient's consent is mandatory. The practices and attitudes associated with pacemaker deactivation differ significantly from those associated with ICD deactivation. It is therefore crucial to be aware of the legal situation in the jurisdiction in which the physician is practicing. The decision to deactivate CIEDs should be part of a well deliberated and transparent process. Ethical and legal guidance should be readily available to counsel and support these difficult decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24384727     DOI: 10.1007/s00063-013-0282-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed        ISSN: 2193-6218            Impact factor:   0.840


  31 in total

1.  Current controversies in critical care ethics: not just end of life.

Authors:  Michael A DeVita; Jeffrey Groeger; Robert Truog
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 2.  [Ethical aspects in end-of-life care].

Authors:  F Nauck
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 0.840

3.  Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator deactivation at the end of life: a physician survey.

Authors:  Amy S Kelley; M Carrington Reid; David H Miller; Joseph J Fins; Mark S Lachs
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Should implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and permanent pacemakers in patients with terminal illness be deactivated? Deactivating implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and permanent pacemakers in patients with terminal illness. An ethical distinction.

Authors:  G Neal Kay; Gregory T Bittner
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-06

5.  The ethics of deactivating implanted cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Berger
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Paul S Mueller; Keith M Swetz; Monica R Freeman; Kari A Carter; Mary Eliot Crowley; Cathy J Anderson Severson; Soon J Park; Daniel P Sulmasy
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Seven legal barriers to end-of-life care: myths, realities, and grains of truth.

Authors:  A Meisel; L Snyder; T Quill
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Deactivation of implanted cardioverter-defibrillators at the end of life: results of the EHRA survey.

Authors:  Germanas Marinskis; Lieselot van Erven
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 9.  [The chronic critically ill patient from the cardiologist's perspective].

Authors:  U Janssens; S Reith
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 0.840

10.  Should implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and permanent pacemakers in patients with terminal illness be deactivated? Deactivating permanent pacemaker in patients with terminalillness. Patient autonomy is paramount.

Authors:  Richard A Zellner; Mark P Aulisio; William R Lewis
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.