Raphael Rosso1, Amir Halkin2, Yoav Michowitz2, Bernard Belhassen2, Aharon Glick2, Sami Viskin2. 1. Department of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Electronic address: roswin1@gmail.com. 2. Department of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During radiofrequency (RF) ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, a circular multielectrode recording "lasso" catheter is generally positioned within each pulmonary vein (PV) to determine when pulmonary vein potentials (PVPs) are present and when they have been ablated. The new irrigated multipolar nMARQ circular ablation catheter is positioned within the left atrium to create contiguous circular ablation lines around each PV ostium. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the recordings obtained from the nMARQ catheter position around the PV ostium accurately reproduce the recordings obtained from a lasso catheter positioned within that vein. METHODS: In 10 patients undergoing RF ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, we placed an nMARQ and a lasso catheter around and within each PV, respectively. Recordings obtained from both catheters at baseline and after RF ablation were compared. RESULTS: At baseline, recordings of PVPs in both catheters were concordant in 92% of all PVs. However, after RF delivery, the concordance between the nMARQ and lasso recordings was poor. The discordant result most commonly observed was disappearance of "PVPs" from the nMARQ catheter with persistence of PVPs in the lasso catheter (12 of 39 [30%]). Conversely, the delivery of RF frequently resulted in fragmented electrograms (pseudo-PVPs) on the nMARQ catheter despite evidence of PV isolation by lasso catheter recordings. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an nMARQ catheter alone, as currently recommended, may lead to underestimation and overestimation of the number of RF applications required to achieve PV isolation.
BACKGROUND: During radiofrequency (RF) ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, a circular multielectrode recording "lasso" catheter is generally positioned within each pulmonary vein (PV) to determine when pulmonary vein potentials (PVPs) are present and when they have been ablated. The new irrigated multipolar nMARQ circular ablation catheter is positioned within the left atrium to create contiguous circular ablation lines around each PV ostium. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the recordings obtained from the nMARQ catheter position around the PV ostium accurately reproduce the recordings obtained from a lasso catheter positioned within that vein. METHODS: In 10 patients undergoing RF ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, we placed an nMARQ and a lasso catheter around and within each PV, respectively. Recordings obtained from both catheters at baseline and after RF ablation were compared. RESULTS: At baseline, recordings of PVPs in both catheters were concordant in 92% of all PVs. However, after RF delivery, the concordance between the nMARQ and lasso recordings was poor. The discordant result most commonly observed was disappearance of "PVPs" from the nMARQ catheter with persistence of PVPs in the lasso catheter (12 of 39 [30%]). Conversely, the delivery of RF frequently resulted in fragmented electrograms (pseudo-PVPs) on the nMARQ catheter despite evidence of PV isolation by lasso catheter recordings. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an nMARQ catheter alone, as currently recommended, may lead to underestimation and overestimation of the number of RF applications required to achieve PV isolation.
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; José Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane Journal: Europace Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Antonio Dello Russo; Gaetano Fassini; Michela Casella; Antonio Di Monaco; Stefania Riva; Valentina Romano; Massimo Moltrasio; Fabrizio Tundo; Giuseppe De Martino; Benedetta Majocchi; Vittoria Marino; Eleonora Russo; Francesca Pizzamiglio; Giuseppe Del Giorno; Gemma Pelargonio; Luigi Di Biase; Andrea Natale; Claudio Tondo Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Ka H C Li; Mei Dong; Mengqi Gong; George Bazoukis; Ishan Lakhani; Yan Y Ting; Sunny H Wong; Guangping Li; William K K Wu; Vassilios S Vassiliou; Martin C S Wong; Konstantinos Letsas; Yimei Du; Victoria Laxton; Bryan P Yan; Yat S Chan; Yunlong Xia; Tong Liu; Gary Tse Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 4.566