Taisheng Li1, Fuping Guo2, Yijia Li2, Chengda Zhang2, Yang Han2, Wei Lye2, Yun He3, Hongzhou Lu4, Jing Xie2, Aiqiong Huang5, Yanling Li2, Xiaoping Tang6, Hui Wang7, Tong Zhang8, Guiju Gao9, Junkang Lei10, Xiaoying Zhang2, Xinhua Wu11, Yongtao Sun12, Jinsong Bai13, Ling Luo2, Huanling Wang2. 1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China. Email: litsh@263.net. 2. Department of Infectious Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China. 3. The Infectious Disease Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, Henan 450061, China. 4. Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 201508, China. 5. Fuzhou Infectious Diseases Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China. 6. Guangzhou No. 8 People's Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China. 7. Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518112, China. 8. Beijing You'an Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100054, China. 9. Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100011, China. 10. Yunnan AIDS Care Center, Kunming, Yunnan 650000, China. 11. The First People's Hospital of Honghe State, Honghe, Yunnan 650000, China. 12. Tangdu Hospital Affiliated to the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, China. 13. Kunming Third People's Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan 650041, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An zidovudine (AZT)-substitution regimen containing 24-week stavudine (d4T) followed by long-term AZT for HIV therapy is potential to trade off short-term AZT-related anemia and long-term risks associated with d4T in resource-limited settings. However, evidence is scarce. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of AZT-substitution regimen, aiming to find a regimen with better efficacy, less adverse events, and more affordability in resource-limited settings. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter study enrolled 499 (190 on d4T regimen, 172 on AZT regimen, and 137 on AZT-substitution regimen) HIV-1-infected subjects who initiated combined antiretroviral therapy and attended follow-up visits over 96 weeks from 2009 to 2011. Lamivudine (3TC) and either nevirapine (NVP) or efavirenz (EFV) were the other two drugs in the antiretroviral regimens. Virologic and immunologic responses and adverse events were monitored at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96. RESULTS: In terms of hematological adverse effects, AZT-substitution group had similar safety profiles to d4T group and was superior to AZT group. In comparison with AZT-substitution group, AZT group was associated with higher risk of developing anemia (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for anemia ≥ grade II, 8.44, 95% CI 1.81-39.46) and neutropenia (aHR for neutropenia ≥ grade II, 1.86, 95% CI 1.19-2.93). The prevalence of lipodystrophy in d4T group was 19.5%, while that in AZT-substitution group was zero. As to antiretroviral efficacy, these three groups showed no differences. CONCLUSION: AZT-substitution regimen provides a relatively safe and effective first-line antiretroviral strategy in resource-limited settings.
BACKGROUND: An zidovudine (AZT)-substitution regimen containing 24-week stavudine (d4T) followed by long-term AZT for HIV therapy is potential to trade off short-term AZT-related anemia and long-term risks associated with d4T in resource-limited settings. However, evidence is scarce. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of AZT-substitution regimen, aiming to find a regimen with better efficacy, less adverse events, and more affordability in resource-limited settings. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter study enrolled 499 (190 on d4T regimen, 172 on AZT regimen, and 137 on AZT-substitution regimen) HIV-1-infected subjects who initiated combined antiretroviral therapy and attended follow-up visits over 96 weeks from 2009 to 2011. Lamivudine (3TC) and either nevirapine (NVP) or efavirenz (EFV) were the other two drugs in the antiretroviral regimens. Virologic and immunologic responses and adverse events were monitored at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96. RESULTS: In terms of hematological adverse effects, AZT-substitution group had similar safety profiles to d4T group and was superior to AZT group. In comparison with AZT-substitution group, AZT group was associated with higher risk of developing anemia (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for anemia ≥ grade II, 8.44, 95% CI 1.81-39.46) and neutropenia (aHR for neutropenia ≥ grade II, 1.86, 95% CI 1.19-2.93). The prevalence of lipodystrophy in d4T group was 19.5%, while that in AZT-substitution group was zero. As to antiretroviral efficacy, these three groups showed no differences. CONCLUSION:AZT-substitution regimen provides a relatively safe and effective first-line antiretroviral strategy in resource-limited settings.