Literature DB >> 24384400

Context-specific control and context selection in conflict tasks.

Nathalie Schouppe1, K Richard Ridderinkhof2, Tom Verguts3, Wim Notebaert3.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether participants prefer contexts with relatively little cognitive conflict and whether this preference is related to context-specific control. A conflict selection task was administered in which participants had to choose between two categories that contained different levels of conflict. One category was associated with 80% congruent Stroop trials and 20% incongruent Stroop trials, while the other category was associated with only 20% congruent Stroop trials and 80% incongruent Stroop trials. As predicted, participants selected the low-conflict category more frequently, indicating that participants avoid contexts with high-conflict likelihood. Furthermore, we predicted a correlation between this preference for the low-conflict category and the control implementation associated with the categories (i.e., context-specific proportion congruency effect, CSPC effect). Results however did not show such a correlation, thereby failing to support a relationship between context control and context selection.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2300; 2340; Avoidance; Context-specific control; Decision-making; Response conflict

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24384400     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  11 in total

1.  Cognitive effort is modulated outside of the explicit awareness of conflict frequency: Evidence from pupillometry.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Diede; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  No pain, no gain: the affective valence of congruency conditions changes following a successful response.

Authors:  Nathalie Schouppe; Senne Braem; Jan De Houwer; Massimo Silvetti; Tom Verguts; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The Subjective Value of Cognitive Effort is Encoded by a Domain-General Valuation Network.

Authors:  Andrew Westbrook; Bidhan Lamichhane; Todd Braver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review.

Authors:  David Dignath; Andreas B Eder; Marco Steinhauser; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

5.  The Role of Anterior Cingulate Cortex in the Affective Evaluation of Conflict.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Joseph A King; Franziska M Korb; Ruth M Krebs; Wim Notebaert; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Conscious and unconscious context-specific cognitive control.

Authors:  Nathalie Schouppe; Evelien de Ferrerre; Filip Van Opstal; Senne Braem; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-04

7.  Different Stages, Different Signals: The Modulating Effect of Cognitive Conflict on Subsequent Processing.

Authors:  Fada Pan; Liang Shi; Li Zhang; Qingyun Lu; Song Xue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Measuring Adaptive Control in Conflict Tasks.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Julie M Bugg; James R Schmidt; Matthew J C Crump; Daniel H Weissman; Wim Notebaert; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 9.  A mosaic of cost-benefit control over cortico-striatal circuitry.

Authors:  Andrew Westbrook; Michael J Frank; Roshan Cools
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 24.482

10.  Developing adaptive control: Age-related differences in task choices and awareness of proactive and reactive control demands.

Authors:  J C Niebaum; N Chevalier; R M Guild; Y Munakata
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.