Literature DB >> 24384271

Associated lesions requiring additional surgical treatment in grade 3 acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Paolo Arrigoni1, Paul C Brady1, Leonardo Zottarelli1, Johannes Barth1, Pablo Narbona1, David Huberty1, Samuel S Koo1, Christopher R Adams1, Peter Parten1, Patrick J Denard, Patrick Denard1, Stephen S Burkhart2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of associated pathologic shoulder lesions that were addressed surgically in grade 3 acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations, as well as to compare this incidence between younger and older patients and between acute and chronic cases.
METHODS: In this multicenter nonrandomized retrospective study, 98 patients operated on for grade 3 ACJ dislocation underwent concomitant arthroscopic evaluation for the identification and treatment of any associated lesions. The type and treatment of associated lesions were collected in a central database and analyzed. We classified patients according to age (<45 years and ≥ 45 years) and according to the length of time between trauma and surgical treatment (≤ 30 days and ≥ 120 days), obtaining the following stratification: younger acute, older acute, younger chronic, and older chronic.
RESULTS: Of the patients, 42 (42.8%) were diagnosed with at least 1 additional pathologic lesion, and 29 (29.5%) required a dedicated additional treatment. Rates of treatment on associated lesions were analyzed: younger versus older groups presented a significant difference, as did younger acute versus older acute groups; SLAP and posterior rotator cuff tear treatments represented 24 of the 35 additional surgeries (68.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of associated pathologic lesions requiring additional surgical treatment in patients with ACJ dislocation was 29.5%. Patients aged 45 years or older had a greater risk of presenting with associated lesions that needed to be surgically addressed (odds ratio, 3.01). The overall rates of associated surgical lesions in acute versus chronic cases were not shown to be significantly different. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic case series.
Copyright © 2014 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24384271     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Injuries of the acromioclavicular joint: Hook plate versus arthroscopy].

Authors:  G Jensen; A Ellwein; C Voigt; J C Katthagen; H Lill
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Horizontal and Vertical Stabilization of Acute Unstable Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries Arthroscopy-Assisted.

Authors:  Luis Natera Cisneros; Juan Sarasquete Reiriz; Marina Besalduch; Alexandru Petrica; Ana Escolà; Joaquim Rodriguez; Jan Carlo Fallone
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-11-23

Review 3.  [Therapy of acute acromioclavicular joint instability. Meta-analysis of arthroscopic/minimally invasive versus open procedures].

Authors:  T Helfen; G Siebenbürger; B Ockert; F Haasters
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries: Is there really a difference between surgical management in the acute or chronic setting?

Authors:  Luis Natera Cisneros; Juan Sarasquete Reiriz
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-10-25

5.  Low prevalence of relevant associated articular lesions in patients with acute III-VI acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Juan Sarasquete; Mario Gil de Rozas; Pedro Costa; Juan Daniel Tovío; Eduardo Carpinteiro; Abdul Ilah Hachem; Manuel Perez España; Cristina Asenjo Gismero; Jorge Diaz Heredia; Miguel García Navlet
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Management of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Luis Natera Cisneros; Juan Sarasquete Reiriz
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-08-19

Review 7.  [Distal clavicle fractures. Classifications and management].

Authors:  Ben Ockert; E Wiedemann; F Haasters
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  [Combined ac joint dislocation and distal clavicle fracture. Closed reduction and arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular fixation].

Authors:  G Siebenbürger; T Helfen; W Flatz; F Haasters; B Ockert
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Concomitant glenohumeral pathologies associated with acute and chronic grade III and grade V acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Gunnar Jensen; Peter J Millett; Dimitri S Tahal; Mireille Al Ibadi; Helmut Lill; Jan Christoph Katthagen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  The prevalence of intraarticular associated lesions after acute acromioclavicular joint injuries is 20%. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Miguel Santiago Moreno Romero; Jorge Diaz Heredia; Raquel Ruiz Díaz; Alfonso Muriel; Jesus López-Alcalde
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.