BACKGROUND: Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) are often tested as a screening tool in patients with suspected systemic lupus erythematosus or connective tissue diseases. ANA can be seen in healthy controls (HC) and patients with multiple medical problems (MMP). OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of ANA and anti-dsDNA in SLE patients, using sera from HC and MMP patients. METHODS: Serum samples from HC, MMP and SLE patients, 100 in each group, were analyzed for the presence of ANA and anti-dsDNA, by indirect immunofluorescent assay, using a HEp-2 cell and Crithidia luciliae as substrates, respectively. RESULTS: The prevalence of ANA at a titer of ≥1:80 and ≥ 1:160 was 8% and 4%, respectively, in HC; and it was 12% and 6% respectively, in MMP patients. The prevalence of anti-dsDNA was 0% in HC and 3% in MMP patients. When using HC sera for the diagnosis of SLE, the sensitivity of ANA at a titer of ≥ 1:80 and ≥ 1:160 was 98% and 90%, respectively, with specificity of 92% and 96%, respectively. The specificity decreased to 88% and 94%, respectively, when using sera from MMP patients. The specificity of anti-dsDNA was 100% and 97%, when using sera from HC and MMP patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: ANA and anti-dsDNA gave high sensitivity and high specificity in patients with SLE, even when using MMP patient's sera as controls. Physicians should take care in interpreting ANA and anti-dsDNA results in MMP patients who do not have signs or symptoms of SLE or connective tissue diseases.
BACKGROUND: Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) are often tested as a screening tool in patients with suspected systemic lupus erythematosus or connective tissue diseases. ANA can be seen in healthy controls (HC) and patients with multiple medical problems (MMP). OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of ANA and anti-dsDNA in SLEpatients, using sera from HC and MMP patients. METHODS: Serum samples from HC, MMP and SLEpatients, 100 in each group, were analyzed for the presence of ANA and anti-dsDNA, by indirect immunofluorescent assay, using a HEp-2 cell and Crithidia luciliae as substrates, respectively. RESULTS: The prevalence of ANA at a titer of ≥1:80 and ≥ 1:160 was 8% and 4%, respectively, in HC; and it was 12% and 6% respectively, in MMP patients. The prevalence of anti-dsDNA was 0% in HC and 3% in MMP patients. When using HC sera for the diagnosis of SLE, the sensitivity of ANA at a titer of ≥ 1:80 and ≥ 1:160 was 98% and 90%, respectively, with specificity of 92% and 96%, respectively. The specificity decreased to 88% and 94%, respectively, when using sera from MMP patients. The specificity of anti-dsDNA was 100% and 97%, when using sera from HC and MMP patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: ANA and anti-dsDNA gave high sensitivity and high specificity in patients with SLE, even when using MMP patient's sera as controls. Physicians should take care in interpreting ANA and anti-dsDNA results in MMP patients who do not have signs or symptoms of SLE or connective tissue diseases.
Authors: Mariam P Alexander; Fernando C Fervenza; An S De Vriese; Richard J H Smith; Samih H Nasr; Lynn D Cornell; Loren P Herrera Hernandez; Yuzhou Zhang; Sanjeev Sethi Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2015-07-18 Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: Gabriela Schmajuk; Bimba F Hoyer; Martin Aringer; Sindhu R Johnson; David I Daikh; Thomas Dörner Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Abdullah G Al-Kushi; Firas S Azzeh; Eslam A Header; Naser A ElSawy; Haifa H Hijazi; Abdelelah S Jazar; Mazen M Ghaith; Mohammed A Alarjah Journal: Saudi J Med Med Sci Date: 2018-08-14
Authors: Thomas A Pollak; Jonathan P Rogers; Robert G Nagele; Mark Peakman; James M Stone; Anthony S David; Philip McGuire Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 9.306