J G Hiller1, M B Hacking, E K Link, K L Wessels, B J Riedel. 1. Department of Anaesthesia, The Royal Marsden, Chelsea, London, UK; Department of Cancer Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent interest has focused on the role of perioperative epidural analgesia in improving cancer outcomes. The heterogeneity of studies (tumour type, stage and outcome endpoints) has produced inconsistent results. Clinical practice also highlights the variability in epidural effectiveness. We considered the novel hypothesis that effective epidural analgesia improves cancer outcomes following gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery in patients with grouped pathological staging. METHODS: Following institutional approval, a database analysis identified 140 patients, with 2-year minimum follow-up after gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery. All patients were operated on by a single surgeon (2005-2010). Information pertaining to cancer and survival outcomes was extracted. RESULTS: Univariate analysis demonstrated a 1-year 14% vs. 33% (P = 0.01) and 2-year 27% vs. 40% [hazard ratio (HR)=0.59; 95% CI, 0.32-1.09, P = 0.087] incidence of cancer recurrence in patients with (vs. without) effective (> 36 h duration) epidural analgesia, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated increased time to cancer recurrence (HR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.17-0.63, P < 0.0001) and overall survival benefit (HR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.21-0.83, P < 0.0001) at 2-year follow-up following effective epidural analgesia. Subgroup analysis identified epidural-related cancer recurrence benefit in patients with oesophageal cancer (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16-0.75, P = 0.005) and in patients with tumour lymphovascular space infiltration (LVSI), (HR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.26-0.94, P = 0.03). Effective epidural analgesia improved estimated median time to death (2.9 vs. 1.8 years, P = 0.029) in patients with tumour LVSI. CONCLUSIONS: This study found an association between effective post-operative epidural analgesia and medium-term benefit on cancer recurrence and survival following oesophageal surgery. A prospective study that controls for disease type, stage and epidural effectiveness is warranted.
BACKGROUND: Recent interest has focused on the role of perioperative epidural analgesia in improving cancer outcomes. The heterogeneity of studies (tumour type, stage and outcome endpoints) has produced inconsistent results. Clinical practice also highlights the variability in epidural effectiveness. We considered the novel hypothesis that effective epidural analgesia improves cancer outcomes following gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery in patients with grouped pathological staging. METHODS: Following institutional approval, a database analysis identified 140 patients, with 2-year minimum follow-up after gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery. All patients were operated on by a single surgeon (2005-2010). Information pertaining to cancer and survival outcomes was extracted. RESULTS: Univariate analysis demonstrated a 1-year 14% vs. 33% (P = 0.01) and 2-year 27% vs. 40% [hazard ratio (HR)=0.59; 95% CI, 0.32-1.09, P = 0.087] incidence of cancer recurrence in patients with (vs. without) effective (> 36 h duration) epidural analgesia, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated increased time to cancer recurrence (HR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.17-0.63, P < 0.0001) and overall survival benefit (HR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.21-0.83, P < 0.0001) at 2-year follow-up following effective epidural analgesia. Subgroup analysis identified epidural-related cancer recurrence benefit in patients with oesophageal cancer (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16-0.75, P = 0.005) and in patients with tumour lymphovascular space infiltration (LVSI), (HR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.26-0.94, P = 0.03). Effective epidural analgesia improved estimated median time to death (2.9 vs. 1.8 years, P = 0.029) in patients with tumour LVSI. CONCLUSIONS: This study found an association between effective post-operative epidural analgesia and medium-term benefit on cancer recurrence and survival following oesophageal surgery. A prospective study that controls for disease type, stage and epidural effectiveness is warranted.
Authors: Jonathan G Hiller; Nicholas J Perry; George Poulogiannis; Bernhard Riedel; Erica K Sloan Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Sebastian Heinrich; Katrin Janitz; Susanne Merkel; Peter Klein; Joachim Schmidt Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2014-09-21 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Lijian Pei; Gang Tan; Lei Wang; Wenjuan Guo; Bo Xiao; Xianli Gao; Li Wang; Hong Li; Zhonghuang Xu; Xiuhua Zhang; Jing Zhao; Jie Yi; Yuguang Huang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Caroline P Le; Cameron J Nowell; Corina Kim-Fuchs; Edoardo Botteri; Jonathan G Hiller; Hilmy Ismail; Matthew A Pimentel; Ming G Chai; Tara Karnezis; Nicole Rotmensz; Giuseppe Renne; Sara Gandini; Colin W Pouton; Davide Ferrari; Andreas Möller; Steven A Stacker; Erica K Sloan Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 14.919