OBJECTIVES: To examine whether anticholinergic activity (AA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum is associated with risk of delirium in individuals with hip fracture. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two university hospitals in Oslo, Norway, and Edinburgh, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals admitted with acute hip fracture (N = 151). MEASUREMENTS: Participants were assessed daily for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method (preoperatively and postoperative days 1-5 (all) or until discharge (participants with delirium)). Prefracture cognitive function was assessed using the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE). Serum was collected preoperatively and CSF at the onset of spinal anesthesia. AA in serum (SAA) and CSF samples was determined according to a muscarinic radio receptor bioassay. The association between AA measures and delirium was evaluated using logistic multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Fifty-two (54%) of the participants in Oslo and 20 (39%) in Edinburgh developed delirium. There was no statistically significant difference in AA between participants with and without delirium in Oslo (serum: 7.02 vs 6.08 pmol/mL, P = .54; CSF: 0.39 vs 0.48 pmol/mL, P = .26) or in Edinburgh (serum: 1.35 vs 1.62 pmol/mL, P = .76; CSF: 0.36 vs 0.31 pmol/mL, P = .93). Nor was there any difference in SAA (Oslo, P = .74; Edinburgh, P = .51) or CSF AA (Oslo, P = .21; Edinburgh, P = .93) when participants were subdivided into prevalent, incident, subsyndromal, and never delirium. Stratifying participants according to prefracture cognitive status (IQCODE) gave the same results. CONCLUSION: This is the first study of AA in CSF of individuals with and without delirium. The study does not support the hypothesis that central (CSF) or peripheral (serum) AA is an important mechanism of delirium in individuals with hip fracture.
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether anticholinergic activity (AA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum is associated with risk of delirium in individuals with hip fracture. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two university hospitals in Oslo, Norway, and Edinburgh, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals admitted with acute hip fracture (N = 151). MEASUREMENTS: Participants were assessed daily for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method (preoperatively and postoperative days 1-5 (all) or until discharge (participants with delirium)). Prefracture cognitive function was assessed using the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE). Serum was collected preoperatively and CSF at the onset of spinal anesthesia. AA in serum (SAA) and CSF samples was determined according to a muscarinic radio receptor bioassay. The association between AA measures and delirium was evaluated using logistic multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Fifty-two (54%) of the participants in Oslo and 20 (39%) in Edinburgh developed delirium. There was no statistically significant difference in AA between participants with and without delirium in Oslo (serum: 7.02 vs 6.08 pmol/mL, P = .54; CSF: 0.39 vs 0.48 pmol/mL, P = .26) or in Edinburgh (serum: 1.35 vs 1.62 pmol/mL, P = .76; CSF: 0.36 vs 0.31 pmol/mL, P = .93). Nor was there any difference in SAA (Oslo, P = .74; Edinburgh, P = .51) or CSF AA (Oslo, P = .21; Edinburgh, P = .93) when participants were subdivided into prevalent, incident, subsyndromal, and never delirium. Stratifying participants according to prefracture cognitive status (IQCODE) gave the same results. CONCLUSION: This is the first study of AA in CSF of individuals with and without delirium. The study does not support the hypothesis that central (CSF) or peripheral (serum) AA is an important mechanism of delirium in individuals with hip fracture.
Authors: Kristi Henjum; Else Quist-Paulsen; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Lars N G Nilsson; Leiv Otto Watne Journal: J Neuroinflammation Date: 2018-11-03 Impact factor: 8.322
Authors: John Kealy; Carol Murray; Eadaoin W Griffin; Ana Belen Lopez-Rodriguez; Dáire Healy; Lucas Silva Tortorelli; John P Lowry; Leiv Otto Watne; Colm Cunningham Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 6.167