Véronique Daneault1, Marc Hébert2, Geneviève Albouy3, Julien Doyon4, Marie Dumont5, Julie Carrier1, Gilles Vandewalle1. 1. Functional Neuroimaging Unit, University of Montreal Geriatric Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada ; Center for Advanced Research in Sleep Medicine (CARSM), Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, QC, Canada ; Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2. Centre de recherche Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada, G1J2G3. 3. Functional Neuroimaging Unit, University of Montreal Geriatric Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 4. Functional Neuroimaging Unit, University of Montreal Geriatric Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada ; Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 5. Center for Advanced Research in Sleep Medicine (CARSM), Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Light exposure, particularly blue light, is being recognized as a potent mean to stimulate alertness and cognition in young individuals. Aging is associated with changes in alertness regulation and cognition. Whether the effect of light on cognitive brain function changes with aging is unknown, however. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Functional Neuroimaging Unit, University of Montreal Geriatric Institute. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen younger (23 ± 4.1 y) and 14 older (61 ± 4.5 y) healthy participants were recruited in the current study. INTERVENTION: Blue light administration. MEASUREMENTS: We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to record brain responses to an auditory working memory task in young and older healthy individuals, alternatively maintained in darkness or exposed to blue light. RESULTS: Results show that the older brain remains capable of showing sustained responses to light in several brain areas. However, compared to young individuals, the effect of blue light is decreased in the pulvinar, amygdala, and tegmentum as well as in the insular, prefrontal, and occipital cortices in elderly individuals. CONCLUSION: The effect of blue light on brain responses diminishes with aging in areas typically involved in visual functions and in key regions for alertness regulation and higher executive processes. Our findings provide the first indications that the effect of light on cognition may be reduced in healthy aging.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Light exposure, particularly blue light, is being recognized as a potent mean to stimulate alertness and cognition in young individuals. Aging is associated with changes in alertness regulation and cognition. Whether the effect of light on cognitive brain function changes with aging is unknown, however. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Functional Neuroimaging Unit, University of Montreal Geriatric Institute. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen younger (23 ± 4.1 y) and 14 older (61 ± 4.5 y) healthy participants were recruited in the current study. INTERVENTION: Blue light administration. MEASUREMENTS: We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to record brain responses to an auditory working memory task in young and older healthy individuals, alternatively maintained in darkness or exposed to blue light. RESULTS: Results show that the older brain remains capable of showing sustained responses to light in several brain areas. However, compared to young individuals, the effect of blue light is decreased in the pulvinar, amygdala, and tegmentum as well as in the insular, prefrontal, and occipital cortices in elderly individuals. CONCLUSION: The effect of blue light on brain responses diminishes with aging in areas typically involved in visual functions and in key regions for alertness regulation and higher executive processes. Our findings provide the first indications that the effect of light on cognition may be reduced in healthy aging.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aging; blue light; circadian; cognition; fMRI; light; melanopsin; nonvisual
Authors: Roberto Cabeza; Sander M Daselaar; Florin Dolcos; Steven E Prince; Matthew Budde; Lars Nyberg Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Karen J Miller; Prabha Siddarth; Jean M Gaines; John M Parrish; Linda M Ercoli; Katherine Marx; Judah Ronch; Barbara Pilgram; Kasey Burke; Nancy Barczak; Bridget Babcock; Gary W Small Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Yonas E Geda; Taryn C Silber; Rosebud O Roberts; David S Knopman; Teresa J H Christianson; V Shane Pankratz; Bradley F Boeve; Eric G Tangalos; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Cho-Yi Chen; Ryan W Logan; Tianzhou Ma; David A Lewis; George C Tseng; Etienne Sibille; Colleen A McClung Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christelle Meyer; Vincenzo Muto; Mathieu Jaspar; Caroline Kussé; Erik Lambot; Sarah L Chellappa; Christian Degueldre; Evelyne Balteau; André Luxen; Benita Middleton; Simon N Archer; Fabienne Collette; Derk-Jan Dijk; Christophe Phillips; Pierre Maquet; Gilles Vandewalle Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Robert J Brychta; Nanna Yr Arnardottir; Erlingur Johannsson; Elizabeth C Wright; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Vilmundur Gudnason; Catherine R Marinac; Megan Davis; Annemarie Koster; Paolo Caserotti; Thorarinn Sveinsson; Tamara Harris; Kong Y Chen Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Anna Alkozei; Ryan Smith; Derek A Pisner; John R Vanuk; Sarah M Berryhill; Andrew Fridman; Bradley R Shane; Sara A Knight; William D S Killgore Journal: Sleep Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 5.849