| Literature DB >> 24379903 |
Yun Lin1, Zhi Zhong Li1, Jingmei Zhang1, Jinrong Zhang1, Qian Fan1, Jie Du1.
Abstract
AIM: The elderly are the major population receiving the implantation of a permanent pacemaker (PPM). Infection is a devastating complication. The present study is to verify the relationship between age and PPM implantation infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24379903 PMCID: PMC3863541 DOI: 10.1155/2013/943416
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Baseline characteristics of the study population (mean ± SEM).
| Adult group ( | Elderly group ( |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 54.3 ± 10.6 | 73.2 ± 5.24 | ||
| Sex, M/F | 72/67 | 137/125 | 0.046 | 0.830 |
| Patients residence (Beijing/other places) | 111/20 | 214/48 | 0.569 | 0.451 |
| Nonhealth insurance/health insurance | 23/108 | 53/209 | 0.400 | 0.527 |
| HBP/total ( | 44/131 | 156/262 | 23.53 | <0.0001 |
| Diabetes ( | 18/131 | 63/262 | 5.668 | 0.017 |
| Coronary artery disease ( | 22/131 | 73/262 | 5.837 | 0.016 |
| Causes of PPM implantation | ||||
| Sick sinus syndrome (SSS) | 63 (48.1%) | 133 (50.7%) | 2.966 | 0.0850 |
| AVB (III∘/advanced) | 34 (26.0%) | 33 (12.6 %) | 3.866 | 0.0493 |
| Permanent atrial fibrillation with long RR interval | 27 (20.6%) | 47 (17.9 %) | 0.04981 | 0.8234 |
| Battery exhausted | 15 (11.5%) | 40 (15.3%) | 1.834 | 0.1757 |
| Pacemaker types | ||||
| Single chamber | 30 (22.9%) | 47 (17.9%) | 1.365 | 0.243 |
| Dual chamber | 101 (77.1%) | 215 (82.1%) | ||
| Number of implant | ||||
| One | 111 (84.7%) | 206 (78.6%) | 0.284* | |
| ≥2 | 20 (15.3%) | 56 (21.4 %) |
HBP: high blood pressure; M: male; F: female.
*Exact probability.
The relationship between five factors and positive ratio of sample bacterial culture.
| Factors | The first sampling point | The second sampling point | The third sampling point | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive number (positive ratio) |
|
| Positive number (positive ratio) |
|
| Positive number (positive ratio) |
|
| |
| Gender | 1.031 | 0.310 | 1.157 | 0.561 | 0.852 | 0.356 | |||
| Male: 204 | 21 (10.3) | 28 (13.7) | 18 (8.8) | ||||||
| Female: 189 | 22 (11.6) | 23 (12.2) | 12 (6.3) | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Age | 4.057 | 0.026* | 0.501 | 0.778 | 4.060 | 0.045* | |||
| <65: 131 | 8 (7.6) | 17 (13.0) | 5 (3.8) | ||||||
| ≥65: 262 | 35 (12.6) | 34 (13.0) | 25 (9.3) | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| BP | 2.509 | 0.113 | 0.595 | 0.010 | 0.919 | ||||
| HBP: 200 | 26 (13.0) | 25 (12.5) | 15 (7.5) | ||||||
| Normal BP: 193 | 17 (8.8) | 26 (13.5) | 15 (7.8) | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Blood glucose | 0.690 | 0.408 | 12.593 | 0.002 | 0.309 | 0.578 | |||
| Diabetes: 81 | 11 (13.6) | 20 (24.7) | 5 (6.2) | ||||||
| Nondiabetes: 312 | 32 (10.3) | 31 (9.9) | 25 (8.0) | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| CAD | |||||||||
| CAD: 95 | 10 (10.5) | 0.473 | 0.492 | 12 (12.6) | 0.330 | 0.846 | 9 (9.5) | 0.602 | 0.438 |
| Non-CAD: 298 | 33 (11.1) | 39 (13.1) | 21 (7.7) | ||||||
*P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
The construction of positive straines in the different time point.
| Bacterial strain | The first sampling point | The second sampling point | The third sampling point | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive number | Positive ratio | Positive number | Positive ratio | Positive number | Positive ratio | |
|
| 36*** | 83.7 | 34*** | 66.7 | 15** | 50.0 |
|
| 4 | 9.3 | 8 | 15.7 | 2 | 6.7 |
|
| 1 | 2.3 | 3 | 5.9 | 0 | 0.0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 3 | 5.9 | 0 | 0.0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 3.8 | 6 | 20.0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 4 | 13.3 |
|
| 2 | 4.7 | 1 | 2.0 | 3 | 10.0 |
|
| ||||||
| Total | 43 | 100 | 51 | 100 | 30 | 100 |
**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 versus the other strain.
Aging alleviated the protective effects of rinse.
| Prior to rinse | After rinse |
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive number | Positive ratio | Positive number | Positive ratio | |||
| <65 ( | 17 | 13.0 | 5 | 3.8 | 7.145 | 0.0075* |
| ≥65 ( | 34 | 13.0 | 25 | 9.5 | 1.547 | 0.2136 |
*P < 0.05 versus post-rinse.
Diabetes does not affect the protective effects of rinse in elder patients.
| Prior to rinse | After rinse | χ2 |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive number | Positive ratio | Positive number | Positive ratio | |||
| Diabetes ( | 9 | 14.3 | 7 | 11.1 | 0.294 | >0.05 |
| Nondiabetes ( | 25 | 12.6 | 18 | 9.0 | 1.283 | >0.05 |