Literature DB >> 24379588

Risk factors to predict severe postoperative pancreatic fistula following gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Shuhei Komatsu1, Daisuke Ichikawa1, Kingo Kashimoto1, Takeshi Kubota1, Kazuma Okamoto1, Hirotaka Konishi1, Atsushi Shiozaki1, Hitoshi Fujiwara1, Eigo Otsuji1.   

Abstract

AIM: To allow the identification of high-risk postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) patients with special reference to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification.
METHODS: Between 1997 and 2010, 1341 consecutive patients underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer at the Department of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Japan. Based on the preoperative diagnosis, total or distal gastrectomy and sufficient lymphadenectomy was performed, mainly according to the Japanese guidelines for the treatment of gastric cancer. Of these, 35 patients (2.6%) were diagnosed with Grade B or C POPF according to the ISGPF classification and were treated intensively. The hospital records of these patients were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS: Of 35 patients with severe POPF, 17 (49%) and 18 (51%) patients were classified as Grade B and C POPF, respectively. From several clinical factors, the severity of POPF according to the ISGPF classification was significantly correlated with the duration of intensive POPF treatments (P = 0.035). Regarding the clinical factors to distinguish extremely severe POPF, older patients (P = 0.035, 65 years ≤ vs < 65 years old) and those with lower lymphocyte counts at the diagnosis of POPF (P = 0.007, < 1400/mm(3) vs 1400/mm(3) ≤) were significantly correlated with Grade C POPF, and a low lymphocyte count was an independent risk factor by multivariate analysis [P = 0.045, OR = 10.45 (95%CI: 1.050-104.1)].
CONCLUSION: Caution and intensive care are required for older POPF patients and those with lower lymphocyte counts at the diagnosis of POPF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Gastrectomy; Gastric cancer; International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula classification; Pancreatic fistula

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24379588      PMCID: PMC3870516          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of postoperative pancreatic fistula after total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy by ISGPF classification.

Authors:  Yuichiro Miki; Masanori Tokunaga; Etsuro Bando; Yutaka Tanizawa; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Amylase concentration of drainage fluid after total gastrectomy.

Authors:  T Sano; M Sasako; H Katai; K Maruyama
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula and the risk factors of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiaohua Jiang; Naoki Hiki; Souya Nunobe; Koshi Kumagai; Kyoko Nohara; Takeshi Sano; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients.

Authors:  J J Bonenkamp; I Songun; J Hermans; M Sasako; K Welvaart; J T Plukker; P van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; C W Taat
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-03-25       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula following surgery for gastric and pancreatic neoplasm; is distal pancreaticosplenectomy truly safe?

Authors:  Takehiro Okabayashi; Michiya Kobayashi; Takeki Sugimoto; Ken Okamoto; Kimio Matsuura; Keijiro Araki
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

6.  Gastric cancer treatment guidelines in Japan.

Authors:  Toshifusa Nakajima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Total gastrectomy with dissection of lymph nodes along the splenic artery: a pancreas-preserving method.

Authors:  H Furukawa; M Hiratsuka; O Ishikawa; M Ikeda; H Imamura; S Masutani; M Tatsuta; T Satomi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Postoperative complications following gastrectomy for gastric cancer during the last decade.

Authors:  Daisuke Ichikawa; Hideaki Kurioka; Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Hiroshi Koike; Kazuma Okamoto; Eigo Otsuji; Koichi Shirono; Yasuhiro Shioaki; Eito Ikeda; Fumitaka Mutoh; Hisakazu Yamagishi
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

9.  Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy--Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 9501.

Authors:  Takeshi Sano; Mitsuru Sasako; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Atsushi Nashimoto; Akira Kurita; Masahiro Hiratsuka; Toshimasa Tsujinaka; Taira Kinoshita; Kuniyoshi Arai; Yoshitaka Yamamura; Kunio Okajima
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Total gastrectomy with simultaneous pancreaticosplenectomy or splenectomy in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  E Otsuji; T Yamaguchi; K Sawai; K Okamoto; T Takahashi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic total gastrectomy in clinical stage I gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Daisuke Ichikawa; Shuhei Komatsu; Takeshi Kubota; Kazuma Okamoto; Hirotaka Konishi; Atsushi Shiozaki; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Role of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy compared to laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in suprapancreatic nodal dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Young-Woo Kim; Daniel Reim; Ji Yeon Park; Bang Wool Eom; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Keun Won Ryu; Hong Man Yoon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Koichi Suda; Mariko Man-I; Yoshinori Ishida; Yuichiro Kawamura; Seiji Satoh; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Putative risk factors for postoperative pneumonia which affects poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jun Kiuchi; Shuhei Komatsu; Daisuke Ichikawa; Toshiyuki Kosuga; Kazuma Okamoto; Hirotaka Konishi; Atsushi Shiozaki; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Tomoyo Yasuda; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Is routine drainage necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Yong-Jian Jiang; Ji Li; Feng Yang; Yang Di; Lie Yao; Chen Jin; De-Liang Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a European perspective.

Authors:  Gijsbert I van Boxel; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 7.701

7.  Pancreatic Fistula after D1+/D2 Radical Gastrectomy according to the Updated International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery Criteria: Risk Factors and Clinical Consequences. Experience of Surgeons with High Caseloads in a Single Surgical Center in Eastern Europe.

Authors:  Alexandru Martiniuc; Traian Dumitrascu; Mihnea Ionescu; Stefan Tudor; Monica Lacatus; Vlad Herlea; Catalin Vasilescu
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.720

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.