Literature DB >> 24379582

Clostridium difficile-associated disease: adherence with current guidelines at a tertiary medical center.

Bryan F Curtin1, Yousef Zarbalian1, Mark H Flasar1, Erik von Rosenvinge1.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess adherence with the the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA)/ the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for management of Clostridium difficile (C. difficile)-associated disease (CDAD) at a tertiary medical center.
METHODS: All positive C. difficile stool toxin assays in adults between May 2010 and May 2011 at the University of Maryland Medical Center were identified. CDAD episodes were classified as guideline adherent or non-adherent and these two groups were compared to determine demographic and clinical factors predictive of adherence. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of multiple predictors on guideline adherence.
RESULTS: 320 positive C. difficile stool tests were identified in 290 patients. Stratified by disease severity criteria set forth by the SHEA/IDSA guidelines, 42.2% of cases were mild-moderate, 48.1% severe, and 9.7% severe-complicated. Full adherence with the guidelines was observed in only 43.4% of cases. Adherence was 65.9% for mild-moderate CDAD, which was significantly better than in severe cases (25.3%) or severe-complicated cases (35.5%) (P < 0.001). There was no difference in demographics, hospitalization, ICU exposure, recurrence or 30-d mortality between adherent and non-adherent groups. A multivariate model revealed significantly decreased adherence for severe or severe-complicated episodes (OR = 0.18, 95%CI: 0.11-0.30) and recurrent episodes (OR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.23-0.95).
CONCLUSION: Overall adherence with the SHEA/IDSA guidelines for management of CDAD at a tertiary medical center was poor; this was most pronounced in severe, severe-complicated and recurrent cases. Educational interventions aimed at improving guideline adherence are warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence to the Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines; Clostridium difficile; Hospital Acquired Infections; Metronidazole; Vancomycin

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24379582      PMCID: PMC3870510          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  25 in total

1.  Antimicrobial stewardship programs: how to start and steer a successful program.

Authors:  Richard H Drew
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2009-03

2.  Vancomycin "telephone".

Authors:  Dimitri M Drekonja
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Overcoming barriers to effective recognition and diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  M H Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  Antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance mechanisms of clinical Clostridium difficile from a Chinese tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Danfeng Dong; Lihua Zhang; Xu Chen; Cen Jiang; Beiqin Yu; Xuefeng Wang; Yibing Peng
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 5.283

5.  Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized children in the United States.

Authors:  Cade M Nylund; Anthony Goudie; Jose M Garza; Gerry Fairbrother; Mitchell B Cohen
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2011-01-03

6.  The burden of Clostridium difficile in surgical patients in the United States.

Authors:  Marc Zerey; B Lauren Paton; Amy E Lincourt; Keith S Gersin; Kent W Kercher; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.150

7.  Costs of nosocomial Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea.

Authors:  R-P Vonberg; C Reichardt; M Behnke; F Schwab; S Zindler; P Gastmeier
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Analysis of an outbreak of Clostridium difficile infection controlled with enhanced infection control measures.

Authors:  Cassandra D Salgado; Patrick D Mauldin; Pamela J Fogle; John A Bosso
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 2.918

9.  Antimicrobial stewardship: attempting to preserve a strategic resource.

Authors:  Trevor Van Schooneveld
Journal:  J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect       Date:  2011-07-18

10.  Outpatient healthcare settings and transmission of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Lucy A Jury; Brett Sitzlar; Sirisha Kundrapu; Jennifer L Cadnum; Kim M Summers; Christine P Muganda; Abhishek Deshpande; Ajay K Sethi; Curtis J Donskey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection and Non-compliance with Treatment Guidelines in Adults in 10 US Geographical Locations, 2013-2015.

Authors:  Shannon A Novosad; Yi Mu; Lisa G Winston; Helen Johnston; Elizabeth Basiliere; Danyel M Olson; Monica M Farley; Andrew Revis; Lucy Wilson; Rebecca Perlmutter; Stacy M Holzbauer; Tory Whitten; Erin C Phipps; Ghinwa K Dumyati; Zintars G Beldavs; Valerie L S Ocampo; Corinne M Davis; Marion Kainer; Dale N Gerding; Alice Y Guh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Lack of adherence to SHEA-IDSA treatment guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection is associated with increased mortality.

Authors:  I Patel; M Wungjiranirun; T Theethira; J Villafuerte-Galvez; N Castillo; M Akbari; C D Alonso; D A Leffler; C P Kelly
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for the management of Clostridium difficile infection in Japan: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  K Kobayashi; N Sekiya; Y Ainoda; H Kurai; A Imamura
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Compliance with Clostridium difficile treatment guidelines: effect on patient outcomes.

Authors:  K T Crowell; K G Julian; M Katzman; A S Berg; A Tinsley; E D Williams; W A Koltun; E Messaris
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.434

Review 5.  A Comparison of Current Guidelines of Five International Societies on Clostridium difficile Infection Management.

Authors:  Csaba Fehér; Josep Mensa
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2016-07-28

6.  Patient Outcomes With Prevented vs Negative Clostridioides difficile Tests Using a Computerized Clinical Decision Support Tool.

Authors:  Gregory R Madden; Kyle B Enfield; Costi D Sifri
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.835

7.  Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in community teaching hospital: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ali Elbeddini; Rachel Gerochi
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2021-02-11

8.  Diagnostic stewardship and the 2017 update of the IDSA-SHEA Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Gregory R Madden; Melinda D Poulter; Costi D Sifri
Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)       Date:  2018-09-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.