Literature DB >> 24379571

Early rehabilitation programs after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: evidence and criticism.

Duck-Woo Kim1, Sung-Bum Kang1, Soo-Young Lee1, Heung-Kwon Oh1, Myung-Hoon In1.   

Abstract

During the past several decades, early rehabilitation programs for the care of patients with colorectal surgery have gained popularity. Several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have confirmed that the implementation of these evidence-based detailed perioperative care protocols is useful for early recovery of patients after colorectal resection. Patients cared for based on these protocols had a rapid recovery of bowel movement, shortened length of hospital stay, and fewer complications compared with traditional care programs. However, most of the previous evidence was obtained from studies of early rehabilitation programs adapted to open colonic resection. Currently, limited evidence exists on the effects of early rehabilitation after laparoscopic rectal resection, although this procedure seems to be associated with a higher morbidity than that reported with traditional care. In this article, we review previous studies and guidelines on early rehabilitation programs in patients undergoing rectal surgery. We investigated the status of early rehabilitation programs in rectal surgery and analyzed the limitations of these studies. We also summarized indications and detailed protocol components of current early rehabilitation programs after rectal surgery, focusing on laparoscopic resection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Early rehabilitation; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Fast-track; Laparoscopy; Rectal

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24379571      PMCID: PMC3870499          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  52 in total

1.  Rectal cancer surgery with or without bowel preparation: The French GRECCAR III multicenter single-blinded randomized trial.

Authors:  Frederic Bretagnol; Yves Panis; Eric Rullier; Philippe Rouanet; Stephane Berdah; Bertrand Dousset; Guillaume Portier; Stephane Benoist; Jacques Chipponi; Eric Vicaut
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery.

Authors:  E C Jesus; A Karliczek; D Matos; A A Castro; A N Atallah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

3.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  P M King; J M Blazeby; P Ewings; P J Franks; R J Longman; A H Kendrick; R M Kipling; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 5.  Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S Breukink; J Pierie; T Wiggers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

Review 6.  Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Katia F Güenaga; Delcio Matos; Peer Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

7.  Laparoscopic colectomy without mechanical bowel preparation.

Authors:  Oded Zmora; Alexander Lebedyev; Aviad Hoffman; Marat Khaikin; Yaron Munz; Moshe Shabtai; Amram Ayalon; Danny Rosin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Third Edition).

Authors:  Terese T Horlocker; Denise J Wedel; John C Rowlingson; F Kayser Enneking; Sandra L Kopp; Honorio T Benzon; David L Brown; John A Heit; Michael F Mulroy; Richard W Rosenquist; Michael Tryba; Chun-Su Yuan
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.288

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The effect of the introduction of the ERAS protocol in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  C J A Huibers; M A J de Roos; K H Ong
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  2 in total

1.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway vs traditional care in laparoscopic rectal resection: a single-center experience.

Authors:  A Vignali; U Elmore; A Cossu; M Lemma; B Calì; P de Nardi; R Rosati
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Newly implemented enhanced recovery pathway positively impacts hospital length of stay.

Authors:  Thomas D Martin; Talya Lorenz; Jane Ferraro; Kevin Chagin; Richard M Lampman; Karen L Emery; Joan E Zurkan; Jami L Boyd; Karin Montgomery; Rachel E Lang; James F Vandewarker; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.