Literature DB >> 24379479

Author's reply.

Zile Singh Kundu1, Vinay Gupta1, Sukhbir Singh Sangwan1, Parveen Rana2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24379479      PMCID: PMC3868155          DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.121611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, We appreciate taking interest in our article[1] and raising concerns by Puri and Gulia.[2] Most of the issues raised are discussed in discussion section. It is well addressed that the risk of postoperative fracture was more when the lesion had more side to side diameter with more circumferential destruction and endosteal scalloping of the bone; instead of the lesions, which were more longitudinally placed with good thick cortices to tolerate the load and bending forces. We observed that at least two cortices must be preserved to prevent iatrogenic fracture. Whenever more than two cortices in two views are involved, support in the form of plaster slab or brace must be given for 6-8 weeks and delayed weight bearing. If these cortices are thinned out due to curettage one should perform prophylactic internal fixation to prevent the postoperative fracture. Furthermore, the lesions with very little (<5 mm) subchondral bone are not suitable for this procedure as there are chances of joint collapse and intraarticular fracture. Further, we have observed that in the event of peroperative fracture in tumor like lesions (cysts), we have performed the intramedullary fixation and the cavity filled and healed well even without grafting.[1] We fully agree with your observation in regard to the treatment of giant cell tumor (GCT).[3] However, the size and the volume of the lesion do matter as far as the postoperative fracture is concerned. Hirn et al. found a strong correlation between risk of postoperative fracture and both the size and volume of the cyst. In their study, the average size of the cysts that fractured postoperatively was 108 cm as compared with 58 cm for the cysts that did not fracture. The risk of fracture was 5% in patients with cysts <60 cm as compared with 17% for those with cysts <60 cm. The risk was 3% when the maximum diameter of the cyst was ≤5 cm, but 15% when the diameter was >5 cm.[4] In the end, we clarify that it is correct that there should be at least 5 mm (not 5 cm, a typographical/inadvertent mistake) of subchondral bone so that there is no joint collapse and intraarticular fracture.
  4 in total

1.  Treatment of giant cell tumor of bone: Current concepts.

Authors:  Ajay Puri; Manish Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.251

2.  Curettage of benign bone tumors and tumor like lesions: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Zile Singh Kundu; Vinay Gupta; Sukhbir Singh Sangwan; Parveen Rana
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  Bone defects following curettage do not necessarily need augmentation.

Authors:  Martti Hirn; Uday de Silva; Sujith Sidharthan; Robert J Grimer; Adesegun Abudu; Roger M Tillman; Simon R Carter
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Curettage of benign bone tumors and tumor like lesions: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Ajay Puri; Ashish Gulia
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.251

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.