Literature DB >> 24378978

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for upper tract urolithiasis.

Jack Weaver1, Manoj Monga.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: For the last three decades, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) has been the mainstay of management of urolithiasis; recognized widely by patients and physicians for its noninvasive approach and good outcomes. Recent challenges by endoscopic approaches have driven ongoing research to refine indications, define outcomes and explore innovations. RECENT
FINDINGS: Utilization of SWL remains high, despite increasing utilization of endoscopic approaches. Patient selection is critical--outcomes with percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy after failed SWL are not as good as those obtained in patients who have not had prior SWL. A structured training in ultrasound localization and proper patient positioning can have dramatic impacts on stone-free results. Stone size, location, Hounsfield unit stone attenuation and stone volume remain important predictors of outcomes. Renal cysts may negatively impact outcomes with SWL.
SUMMARY: These recent studies highlight important considerations for patient selection, SWL technique and follow-up for patients undergoing SWL. New technologies hold promise but require further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24378978     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  4 in total

Review 1.  Shockwave lithotripsy: techniques for improving outcomes.

Authors:  Tadeusz Kroczak; Kymora B Scotland; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Computerized tomography attenuation values can be used to differentiate hydronephrosis from pyonephrosis.

Authors:  Emrah Yuruk; Murat Tuken; Suhejb Sulejman; Aykut Colakerol; Ege Can Serefoglu; Kemal Sarica; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy?

Authors:  Chandan Phukan; T J Nirmal; Cornerstone V Wann; J Chandrasingh; Santosh Kumar; Nitin S Kekre; Antony Devasia
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.