Literature DB >> 24378832

Role of protective defunctioning stoma in colorectal resection for endometriosis.

Jérémie Belghiti1, Marcos Ballester1, Sonia Zilberman1, Anne Thomin1, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou1, Marc Bazot2, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara2, Emile Daraï3.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of protective defunctioning stoma (PDS) on the occurrence of digestive tract complications after colorectal resection to treat endometriosis.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing segmental colorectal resection to treat colorectal endometriosis with and without PDS between 2003 and 2011 at Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were assessed at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and each year thereafter. Median follow-up was 60 months. Of 198 patients included for analysis, 53 (27%) had PDS. Overall, 15 (7.5%) digestive tract complications occurred: 9 (4.5%) rectovaginal fistulas and 6 (3%) anastomotic leakages. All rectovaginal fistulas occurred in patients with a low colorectal anastomosis (p < .001) and 88% (8 of 9) in patients with a partial colpectomy (p < .001). PDS was associated with a decrease in the number of rectovaginal fistulas in women undergoing partial colpectomy and low colorectal resection from 27% to 15%, without reaching significance (p = .4). No anastomotic leakage occurred in patients with PDS.
CONCLUSION: Our results support that PDS can be omitted in patients with mid-colorectal anastomosis without partial colpectomy. In patients requiring partial colpectomy or partial colpectomy plus low colorectal anastomosis, PDS remains questionable.
Copyright © 2014 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal endometriosis; Digestive complication; Protective defunctioning stoma; Rectovaginal fistula

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24378832     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  5 in total

1.  Post surgical rectovaginal fistula: who really benefits from stoma diversion?

Authors:  Giuliano Barugola; Elisa Bertocchi; Alessandra Leonardi; Alex M Almoudaris; Giacomo Ruffo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-05-24

2.  Impact of hospital and surgeon case volume on morbidity in colorectal endometriosis management: a plea to define criteria for expert centers.

Authors:  Sofiane Bendifallah; Horace Roman; Chrystel Rubod; Pierre Leguevaque; Antoine Watrelot; Nicolas Bourdel; Marcos Ballester; Emile Darai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Ghost Ileostomy: Safe and Cost-effective Alternative to Ileostomy After Rectal Resection for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis.

Authors:  Alberto Vega Hernández; Jakob Otten; Hildegard Christ; Christoph Ulrici; Elvin Piriyev; Sebastian Ludwig; Claudia Rudroff
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Rectovaginal fistula following surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis: Does lesion size matter?

Authors:  Yunxi Zheng; Ning Zhang; Weiqi Lu; Liang Zhang; Shouxin Gu; Ying Zhang; Xiaofang Yi; Keqin Hua
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Risk of bowel fistula following surgical management of deep endometriosis of the rectosigmoid: a series of 1102 cases.

Authors:  Horace Roman; Valérie Bridoux; Benjamin Merlot; Benoit Resch; Rachid Chati; Julien Coget; Damien Forestier; Jean-Jacques Tuech
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.918

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.