PURPOSE: Recently, a proteomic study of sera from patients with bladder cancer identified S100A8 and S100A9 as tumor-associated proteins. The present cross-sectional study investigates whether calprotectin, the heterodimer of S100A8/S100A9 may serve as a urinary biomarker for the detection of urothelial bladder cancer. METHODS: Urinary calprotectin concentrations were assessed in a population of 181 subjects including 46 cases of bladder cancer. 41 cases of renal cell cancer, 54 cases of prostate cancer, and 40 healthy subjects served as control. Acute kidney injury, urinary tract infection, previous BCG-treatment and secondary transurethral resection of the bladder tumor were defined as exclusion criteria. Assessment was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunohistochemistry detecting calprotectin. RESULTS: Median calprotectin concentrations (ng/ml) were significantly higher in patients with bladder cancer than in healthy controls (522.3 vs. 51.0, p < 0.001), renal cell cancer (90.4, p < 0.001), and prostate cancer (71.8, p < 0.001). In urothelial carcinoma prominent immunostaining occurred in a subset of tumor cells and in infiltrating myeloid cells. Receiver operating characteristic analysis provided an area under the curve of 0.88 for the differentiation of bladder cancer and healthy control. A cut-off value of 140 ng/ml (determined by Youden's index) resulted in sensitivity and specificity values of 80.4 and 92.5 %. Low grade tumors were associated with significantly lower calprotectin concentrations than high grade tumors (351.9 vs. 1635.2 ng/ml, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Urothelial malignancies are associated with highly increased concentrations of calprotecin in the urine. In absence of renal failure and pyuria, calprotectin constitutes a promising biomarker for the detection of bladder cancer.
PURPOSE: Recently, a proteomic study of sera from patients with bladder cancer identified S100A8 and S100A9 as tumor-associated proteins. The present cross-sectional study investigates whether calprotectin, the heterodimer of S100A8/S100A9 may serve as a urinary biomarker for the detection of urothelial bladder cancer. METHODS: Urinary calprotectin concentrations were assessed in a population of 181 subjects including 46 cases of bladder cancer. 41 cases of renal cell cancer, 54 cases of prostate cancer, and 40 healthy subjects served as control. Acute kidney injury, urinary tract infection, previous BCG-treatment and secondary transurethral resection of the bladder tumor were defined as exclusion criteria. Assessment was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunohistochemistry detecting calprotectin. RESULTS: Median calprotectin concentrations (ng/ml) were significantly higher in patients with bladder cancer than in healthy controls (522.3 vs. 51.0, p < 0.001), renal cell cancer (90.4, p < 0.001), and prostate cancer (71.8, p < 0.001). In urothelial carcinoma prominent immunostaining occurred in a subset of tumor cells and in infiltrating myeloid cells. Receiver operating characteristic analysis provided an area under the curve of 0.88 for the differentiation of bladder cancer and healthy control. A cut-off value of 140 ng/ml (determined by Youden's index) resulted in sensitivity and specificity values of 80.4 and 92.5 %. Low grade tumors were associated with significantly lower calprotectin concentrations than high grade tumors (351.9 vs. 1635.2 ng/ml, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Urothelial malignancies are associated with highly increased concentrations of calprotecin in the urine. In absence of renal failure and pyuria, calprotectin constitutes a promising biomarker for the detection of bladder cancer.
Authors: Derya Tilki; Maximilian Burger; Guido Dalbagni; H Barton Grossman; Oliver W Hakenberg; Juan Palou; Oliver Reich; Morgan Rouprêt; Shahrokh F Shariat; Alexandre R Zlotta Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-06-12 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: S G Shapiro; S Raghunath; C Williams; A A Motsinger-Reif; J M Cullen; T Liu; D Albertson; M Ruvolo; A Bergstrom Lucas; J Jin; D W Knapp; J D Schiffman; M Breen Journal: Chromosome Res Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 5.239
Authors: Jan Ebbing; Felix S Seibert; Nikolaos Pagonas; Frederic Bauer; Kurt Miller; Carsten Kempkensteffen; Karsten Günzel; Alexander Bachmann; Hans H Seifert; Cyrill A Rentsch; Peter Ardelt; Christian Wetterauer; Patrizia Amico; Nina Babel; Timm H Westhoff Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Romy M Heilmann; Elizabeth A McNiel; Niels Grützner; David J Lanerie; Jan S Suchodolski; Jörg M Steiner Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 2.741