Literature DB >> 24377820

The impact of template format on the completeness of surgical pathology reports.

Scott A Renshaw1, Mercy Mena-Allauca, Michelle Touriz, Andrew Renshaw, Edwin W Gould.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The College of American Pathologists Cancer Case Summaries templates provide a method for including all necessary pathology information in surgical pathology reports with cancer. How effective these templates are at ensuring a complete report, as measured by a separate outside tumor registry, is not known.
OBJECTIVE: To determine factors that correlate with the completeness of the pathology report.
DESIGN: All surgical pathology reports from our hospital (Baptist Hospital of Miami, Miami, Florida) that used templates from January 2004 through February 2013 were reviewed and assessed for completeness by an outside tumor registry.
RESULTS: From 2004 through June 2012, 6139 surgical pathology reports were completed using the template, but only 5151 reports (84%) were complete. For the period January 2012 through June 2012, experienced pathologists who filled out at least 50 templates (n = 3) had a significantly higher completeness rate (187 of 206; 91%) than did pathologists who filled out less than 50 templates (n = 3; 23 of 35; 65%, P < .001) or pathologists who were new to the templates (n = 1; 81 of 104, 78%; P = .002). When the templates were changed by the elimination of all optional information, sequential numbering of all necessary items, and bolding the distance from the closest margin, completeness significantly improved to 98% (313 of 320, P < .001). The improvement remained constant for the 6 months after the changes in format.
CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of simple formatting changes was associated with significantly improved completeness of pathology reports that use the College of American Pathologists Cancer Case Summaries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24377820     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0733-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  8 in total

Review 1.  Synoptic Reporting: Evidence-Based Review and Future Directions.

Authors:  Andrew A Renshaw; Mercy Mena-Allauca; Edwin W Gould; S Joseph Sirintrapun
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-12

2.  Identification of barriers and facilitators in nationwide implementation of standardized structured reporting in pathology: a mixed method study.

Authors:  J E M Swillens; C E Sluijter; L I H Overbeek; I D Nagtegaal; R P M G Hermens
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caro E Sluijter; Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen; Henk-Jan van Slooten; Iris D Nagtegaal; Lucy I H Overbeek
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Reporting Gleason grade/score in synoptic reports of radical prostatectomies.

Authors:  Andrew A Renshaw; Mercy Mena-Allauca; Edwin W Gould
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2016-12-30

5.  Evidence-based design and evaluation of a whole genome sequencing clinical report for the reference microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  Anamaria Crisan; Geoffrey McKee; Tamara Munzner; Jennifer L Gardy
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Performance of a Web-based Method for Generating Synoptic Reports.

Authors:  Megan A Renshaw; Scott A Renshaw; Mercy Mena-Allauca; Patricia P Carrion; Xiaorong Mei; Arniris Narciandi; Edwin W Gould; Andrew A Renshaw
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2017-03-10

7.  Adequacy of Pathologic Reports of Invasive Breast Cancer From Mastectomy Specimens at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital Oncology Center in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Abdu A Yesufe; Mathewos Assefa; Abebe Bekele; Wondwossen Ergete; Abreha Aynalem; Tigeneh Wondemagegnehu; Johan Tausjø; Gizachew Assefa Tessema; Eva Johanna Kantelhardt; Ted Gansler; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2018-07

8.  Fit-For-Purpose PD-L1 Biomarker Testing For Patient Selection in Immuno-Oncology: Guidelines For Clinical Laboratories From the Canadian Association of Pathologists-Association Canadienne Des Pathologistes (CAP-ACP).

Authors:  Carol C Cheung; Penny Barnes; Gilbert Bigras; Scott Boerner; Jagdish Butany; Fiorella Calabrese; Christian Couture; Jean Deschenes; Hala El-Zimaity; Gabor Fischer; Pierre O Fiset; John Garratt; Laurette Geldenhuys; C Blake Gilks; Marius Ilie; Diana Ionescu; Hyun J Lim; Lisa Manning; Adnan Mansoor; Robert Riddell; Catherine Ross; Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri; Alan Spatz; Paul E Swanson; Victor A Tron; Ming-Sound Tsao; Hangjun Wang; Zhaolin Xu; Emina E Torlakovic
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.