Literature DB >> 24377677

Enhancing arsenic mitigation in Bangladesh: findings from institutional, psychological, and technical investigations.

Richard Johnston1, Stephan J Hug2, Jennifer Inauen3, Nasreen I Khan4, Hans-Joachim Mosler5, Hong Yang6.   

Abstract

As part of a trans-disciplinary research project, a series of surveys and interventions were conducted in different arsenic-affected regions of rural Bangladesh. Surveys of institutional stakeholders identified deep tubewells and piped water systems as the most preferred options, and the same preferences were found in household surveys of populations at risk. Psychological surveys revealed that these two technologies were well-supported by potential users, with self-efficacy and social norms being the principal factors driving behavior change. The principal drawbacks of deep tubewells are that installation costs are too high for most families to own private wells, and that for various socio-cultural-religious reasons, people are not willing to walk long distances to access communal tubewells. In addition, water sector planners have reservations about greater exploitation of the deep aquifer, out of concern for current or future geogenic contamination. Groundwater models and field studies have shown that in the great majority of the affected areas, the risk of arsenic contamination of deep groundwater is small; salinity, iron, and manganese are more likely to pose problems. These constituents can in some cases be avoided by exploiting an intermediate depth aquifer of good chemical quality, which is hydraulically and geochemically separate from the arsenic-contaminated shallow aquifer. Deep tubewells represent a technically sound option throughout much of the arsenic-affected regions, and future mitigation programs should build on and accelerate construction of deep tubewells. Utilization of deep tubewells, however, could be improved by increasing the tubewell density (which requires stronger financial support) to reduce travel times, by considering water quality in a holistic way, and by accompanying tubewell installation with motivational interventions based on psychological factors. By combining findings from technical and social sciences, the efficiency and success of arsenic mitigation in general - and installation of deep tubewells in particular - can be significantly enhanced.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Bangladesh; Behavior change; Groundwater; Institutional analysis; Tubewell

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24377677     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  9 in total

1.  Field testing of over 30,000 wells for arsenic across 400 villages of the Punjab plains of Pakistan and India: Implications for prioritizing mitigation.

Authors:  Alexander van Geen; Abida Farooqi; Anand Kumar; Junaid Ali Khattak; Nisbah Mushtaq; Ishtiaque Hussain; Tyler Ellis; Chander Kumar Singh
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Evidence for Elevated Levels of Arsenic in Public Wells of Bangladesh Due To Improper Installation.

Authors:  I Choudhury; K M Ahmed; M Hasan; M R H Mozumder; P S K Knappett; T Ellis; A van Geen
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Inequitable allocation of deep community wells for reducing arsenic exposure in Bangladesh.

Authors:  A van Geen; K M Ahmed; E B Ahmed; I Choudhury; M R Mozumder; B C Bostick; B J Mailloux
Journal:  J Water Sanit Hyg Dev       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.250

4.  Provision of well-water treatment units to 600 households in Bangladesh: A longitudinal analysis of urinary arsenic indicates fading utility.

Authors:  Tiffany R Sanchez; Diane Levy; Mohammad Hasan Shahriar; Mohammad Nasir Uddin; Abu B Siddique; Joseph H Graziano; Angela Lomax-Luu; Alexander van Geen; Mary V Gamble
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Reduction in exposure to arsenic from drinking well-water in Bangladesh limited by insufficient testing and awareness.

Authors:  A Pfaff; A Schoenfeld; K M Ahmed; A van Geen
Journal:  J Water Sanit Hyg Dev       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.250

Review 6.  Arsenic removal by liquid membranes.

Authors:  Tiziana Marino; Alberto Figoli
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-27

7.  Considering Alternate Pathways of Drinking-Water Contamination: Evidence of Risk Substitution from Arsenic Mitigation Programs in Rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Varun Goel; Griffin J Bell; Sumati Sridhar; Md Sirajul Islam; Md Yunus; Md Taslim Ali; Md Alfazal Khan; Md Nurul Alam; Asg Faruque; Md Masnoon Kabir; Shahabuddin Babu; Katerina Brandt; Victoria Shelus; Mark D Sobsey; Michael Emch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Effectiveness of Different Approaches to Arsenic Mitigation over 18 Years in Araihazar, Bangladesh: Implications for National Policy.

Authors:  Nadia B Jamil; Huan Feng; Kazi Matin Ahmed; Imtiaz Choudhury; Prabhat Barnwal; Alexander van Geen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 9.  Cancer prevention as part of precision medicine: 'plenty to be done'.

Authors:  Bernard W Stewart; Freddie Bray; David Forman; Hiroko Ohgaki; Kurt Straif; Andreas Ullrich; Christopher P Wild
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 4.944

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.