Literature DB >> 24377069

Comparative immediate functional outcomes among cryotherapeutic interventions at the ankle.

Emily E Williams1, Sayers J Miller1, Wayne J Sebastianelli2, Giampietro L Vairo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence detailing the immediate effects of different cryotherapy interventions at the ankle on functional outcomes such as balance and jumping tasks in a physically active population; therefore, the purpose of the present study is to compare the immediate effects of varied modes of cryotherapy applications to the ankle joint on Star Excursion Balance Test and vertical jump height performance. The authors hypothesized that cryotherapy would acutely decrease performance when compared to a control, and that concomitant compression would further hinder outcomes.
METHODS: A crossover study was conducted in a controlled laboratory setting. Thirty (9 men, 21 women) participants (20.6 ± 1.0 years, 1.7 ± 0.1 m, 67.5 ± 11.7 kg) were enrolled. The independent variable was treatment mode; no ice, ice without compression and ice with compression. Dependent variables included center of pressure (COP) excursions, dynamic balance reach distances and vertical jump height for the dominant leg. Participants underwent three separate testing sessions separated by 72-hour rest intervals. The order of treatment and performance measures was randomized to prevent order effects. Normalized dynamic balance reach distances were assessed using the reliable modified Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT). Center of pressure path length was assessed via a force platform during a single-legged static balance task under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Relative vertical jump height was assessed using a single-legged vertical hop test. Group means and standard deviations were calculated by treatment mode. One-way analyses of variance with Tukey's post hoc test were used to calculate differences among treatment modes. p < 0.05 denoted statistical significance.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences existed for all the performance measures among treatment modes.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest no immediate differences in lower extremity performance outcome measures between the respective treatment modes applied to the ankle in a young, healthy and physically active population. Additional investigation is warranted to study the related delayed effects of these interventions. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle; balance; cryotherapy; functional performance

Year:  2013        PMID: 24377069      PMCID: PMC3867076     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  27 in total

1.  Postural stability measures: what to measure and for how long.

Authors:  K Le Clair; C Riach
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Deficits in time-to-boundary measures of postural control with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Jay Hertel; Lauren C Olmsted-Kramer
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Cooling does not affect knee proprioception.

Authors:  J C Ozmun; H A Thieme; C D Ingersoll; K L Knight
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The effect of immersion cryotherapy on medial-lateral postural sway variability in individuals with a lateral ankle sprain.

Authors:  Thomas W Kernozek; John F Greany; Danielle R Anderson; Douglas Van Heel; Roderick L Youngdahl; Benjamin G Benesh; Christopher J Durall
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2008-06

5.  Effects of ankle joint cooling on peroneal short latency response.

Authors:  J Ty Hopkins; Iain Hunter; Todd McLoda
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Ice bag application, active warm-up, and 3 measures of maximal functional performance.

Authors:  Melissa L Richendollar; Lynn A Darby; Travis M Brown
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  The reliability of the star-excursion test in assessing dynamic balance.

Authors:  S J Kinzey; C W Armstrong
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  [The influence of cryotherapy of the ankle on static balance].

Authors:  F Saam; B Leidinger; C O Tibesku
Journal:  Sportverletz Sportschaden       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.077

9.  Chronic ankle instability and fatigue create proximal joint alterations during performance of the Star Excursion Balance Test.

Authors:  P A Gribble; J Hertel; C R Denegar
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  Functional performance following an ice bag application to the hamstrings.

Authors:  Jennifer Fischer; Bonnie L Van Lunen; J David Branch; Jamie L Pirone
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The effects of cryotherapy on proprioception system.

Authors:  Mariusz Paweł Furmanek; Kajetan Słomka; Grzegorz Juras
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.