Literature DB >> 24376908

Validation Study of Automated Dermal/Epidermal Junction Localization Algorithm in Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Images of Skin.

Sila Kurugol1, Milind Rajadhyaksha2, Jennifer G Dy1, Dana H Brooks1.   

Abstract

Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) has seen increasing clinical application for noninvasive diagnosis of skin cancer. Identifying the location of the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) in the image stacks is key for effective clinical imaging. For example, one clinical imaging procedure acquires a dense stack of 0.5×0.5mm FOV images and then, after manual determination of DEJ depth, collects a 5×5mm mosaic at that depth for diagnosis. However, especially in lightly pigmented skin, RCM images have low contrast at the DEJ which makes repeatable, objective visual identification challenging. We have previously published proof of concept for an automated algorithm for DEJ detection in both highly- and lightly-pigmented skin types based on sequential feature segmentation and classification. In lightly-pigmented skin the change of skin texture with depth was detected by the algorithm and used to locate the DEJ. Here we report on further validation of our algorithm on a more extensive collection of 24 image stacks (15 fair skin, 9 dark skin). We compare algorithm performance against classification by three clinical experts. We also evaluate inter-expert consistency among the experts. The average correlation across experts was 0.81 for lightly pigmented skin, indicating the difficulty of the problem. The algorithm achieved epidermis/dermis misclassification rates smaller than 10% (based on 25×25 mm tiles) and average distance from the expert labeled boundaries of ~6.4 μm for fair skin and ~5.3 μm for dark skin, well within average cell size and less than 2x the instrument resolution in the optical axis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  classification; confocal reflectance microscopy; image analysis; skin

Year:  2012        PMID: 24376908      PMCID: PMC3872972          DOI: 10.1117/12.909227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  14 in total

1.  The impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy on the diagnostic accuracy of lentigo maligna and equivocal pigmented and nonpigmented macules of the face.

Authors:  Pascale Guitera; Giovanni Pellacani; Kerry A Crotty; Richard A Scolyer; Ling-Xi L Li; Sara Bassoli; Marco Vinceti; Harold Rabinovitz; Caterina Longo; Scott W Menzies
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 8.551

2.  Automated detection of malignant features in confocal microscopy on superficial spreading melanoma versus nevi.

Authors:  Dan Gareau; Ricky Hennessy; Eric Wan; Giovanni Pellacani; Steven L Jacques
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy enhances secondary evaluation of melanocytic lesions.

Authors:  Pascale Guitera; Giovanni Pellacani; Caterina Longo; Stefania Seidenari; Michelle Avramidis; Scott W Menzies
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 8.551

4.  Pilot study of semiautomated localization of the dermal/epidermal junction in reflectance confocal microscopy images of skin.

Authors:  Sila Kurugol; Jennifer G Dy; Dana H Brooks; Milind Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Semi-automated Algorithm for Localization of Dermal/ Epidermal Junction in Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Images of Human Skin.

Authors:  Sila Kurugol; Jennifer G Dy; Milind Rajadhyaksha; Kirk W Gossage; Jesse Weissman; Dana H Brooks
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2011

6.  In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy: automated diagnostic image analysis of melanocytic skin tumours.

Authors:  S Koller; M Wiltgen; V Ahlgrimm-Siess; W Weger; R Hofmann-Wellenhof; E Richtig; J Smolle; A Gerger
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  Sensitivity and specificity of confocal laser-scanning microscopy for in vivo diagnosis of malignant skin tumors.

Authors:  Armin Gerger; Silvia Koller; Wolfgang Weger; Erika Richtig; Helmut Kerl; Hellmut Samonigg; Peter Krippl; Josef Smolle
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Automatic identification of diagnostic significant regions in confocal laser scanning microscopy of melanocytic skin tumors.

Authors:  M Wiltgen; A Gerger; C Wagner; J Smolle
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.176

9.  Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting.

Authors:  M E Vestergaard; P Macaskill; P E Holt; S W Menzies
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 9.302

10.  The impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnostic accuracy of melanoma and equivocal melanocytic lesions.

Authors:  Giovanni Pellacani; Pascale Guitera; Caterina Longo; Michelle Avramidis; Stefania Seidenari; Scott Menzies
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 8.551

View more
  3 in total

1.  Wavelet-based statistical classification of skin images acquired with reflectance confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Abdelghafour Halimi; Hadj Batatia; Jimmy Le Digabel; Gwendal Josse; Jean Yves Tourneret
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  Advances in the use of reflectance confocal microscopy in melanoma.

Authors:  Andréanne Waddell; Phoebe Star; Pascale Guitera
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2018-05-10

Review 3.  Automating reflectance confocal microscopy image analysis for dermatological research: a review.

Authors:  Imane Lboukili; Georgios Stamatas; Xavier Descombes
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 3.758

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.